Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Ricoh CX2
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 198g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Revealed February 2012
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed August 2009
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Pentax WG-2 GPS versus Ricoh CX2, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Pentax and Ricoh. There exists a significant gap among the resolutions of the WG-2 GPS (16MP) and CX2 (9MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-2 GPS was launched 2 years later than the CX2 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple summary of how the WG-2 GPS grades against the CX2 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS and Ricoh CX2. The complete galleries are provided at Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery and Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 GPS over the Ricoh CX2
| WG-2 GPS | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2012 |  | August 2009 | Fresher by 31 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Pentax WG-2 GPS
| CX2 | WG-2 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax WG-2 GPS and Ricoh CX2
| WG-2 GPS | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera often, you will need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Pentax WG-2 GPS features exterior dimensions of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 198 grams (0.44 lbs) and the Ricoh CX2 has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
See the Pentax WG-2 GPS versus Ricoh CX2 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have at the time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the WG-2 GPS and the CX2.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-2 GPS and CX2 is 91 and 93 respectively.
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing only by checking out specifications. The graphic underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-2 GPS and CX2.
To sum up, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should count on the Pentax WG-2 GPS to provide extra detail utilizing its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs more aggressively. The newer WG-2 GPS provides an advantage in sensor tech.
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
| Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS | Ricoh CX2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Pentax | Ricoh |
| Model | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS | Ricoh CX2 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2012-02-07 | 2009-08-20 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 460k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.40 m | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 198g (0.44 pounds) | 185g (0.41 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 shots | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $300 | $341 |