Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Ricoh CX3
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Ricoh CX3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 198g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Announced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched June 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Ricoh CX3 Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Pentax WG-2 GPS and Ricoh CX3, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Pentax and Ricoh. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the WG-2 GPS (16MP) and CX3 (10MP) but they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe WG-2 GPS was revealed 21 months after the CX3 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a thorough comparison, below is a brief view of how the WG-2 GPS grades vs the CX3 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Ricoh CX3 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS & Ricoh CX3. The full galleries are provided at Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery & Ricoh CX3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 GPS over the Ricoh CX3
| WG-2 GPS | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2012 |  | June 2010 | More modern by 21 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Pentax WG-2 GPS
| CX3 | WG-2 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax WG-2 GPS and Ricoh CX3
| WG-2 GPS | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Ricoh CX3 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Pentax WG-2 GPS provides exterior dimensions of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 198 grams (0.44 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX3 has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Examine the Pentax WG-2 GPS and Ricoh CX3 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the WG-2 GPS against the CX3.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the WG-2 GPS and CX3 is 91 and 92 respectively.
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Ricoh CX3 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizes purely by going through a spec sheet. The pic underneath might give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-2 GPS and CX3.
Clearly, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Pentax WG-2 GPS to show greater detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots much more aggressively. The younger WG-2 GPS should have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Ricoh CX3 Specifications
| Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS | Ricoh CX3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Pentax | Ricoh |
| Model type | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS | Ricoh CX3 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2012-02-07 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.40 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 198 grams (0.44 lbs) | 206 grams (0.45 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 images | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $300 | $329 |