Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Samsung WB35F
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 198g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Launched February 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced January 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Let's look much closer at the Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Samsung WB35F, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Pentax and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-2 GPS (16MP) and the WB35F (16MP) is very close and both cameras offer the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe WG-2 GPS was introduced 23 months earlier than the WB35F making them a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the WG-2 GPS matches up vs the WB35F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS and Samsung WB35F. The whole galleries are viewable at Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery and Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 GPS over the Samsung WB35F
| WG-2 GPS | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Pentax WG-2 GPS
| WB35F | WG-2 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2014 |  | February 2012 | Newer by 23 months |
Common features in the Pentax WG-2 GPS and Samsung WB35F
| WG-2 GPS | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Pentax WG-2 GPS offers exterior dimensions of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 198 grams (0.44 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB35F has sizing of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Samsung WB35F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the WG-2 GPS vs the WB35F.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-2 GPS and WB35F is 91 and 93 respectively.
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to see the difference in sensor dimensions just by looking through specs. The pic underneath will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-2 GPS and WB35F.
All in all, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size and the identical resolution therefore you should expect comparable quality of pictures but you need to take the release date of the cameras into account. The more aged WG-2 GPS will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Pentax | Samsung |
| Model type | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS | Samsung WB35F |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2012-02-07 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.40 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 198 gr (0.44 lbs) | 194 gr (0.43 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $300 | $130 |