Pentax WG-2 vs Samsung TL500
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
88 Imaging
34 Features
54 Overall
42
Pentax WG-2 vs Samsung TL500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Launched February 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F1.8-2.4) lens
- 386g - 114 x 63 x 29mm
- Launched July 2010
- Also referred to as EX1
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Pentax WG-2 vs Samsung TL500 Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Pentax WG-2 versus Samsung TL500, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Pentax and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the WG-2 (16MP) and TL500 (10MP) and the WG-2 (1/2.3") and TL500 (1/1.7") posses totally different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-2 was unveiled 20 months after the TL500 making them a generation away from each other. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a complete comparison, here is a brief summary of how the WG-2 scores against the TL500 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Pentax WG-2 vs Samsung TL500 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Pentax Optio WG-2 & Samsung TL500. The full galleries are viewable at Pentax WG-2 Gallery & Samsung TL500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 over the Samsung TL500
| WG-2 | TL500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2012 |  | July 2010 | More modern by 20 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL500 over the Pentax WG-2
| TL500 | WG-2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display resolution | 614k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+154k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Common features in the Pentax WG-2 and Samsung TL500
| WG-2 | TL500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display sizing |
| Touch display |  | Neither has Touch display |
Pentax WG-2 vs Samsung TL500 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Pentax WG-2 has exterior dimensions of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Samsung TL500 has specifications of 114mm x 63mm x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 386 grams (0.85 lbs).
Compare the Pentax WG-2 versus Samsung TL500 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the WG-2 vs the TL500.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-2 and TL500 is 91 and 88 respectively.
Pentax WG-2 vs Samsung TL500 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to visualise the gap between sensor sizes merely by reading through specifications. The image below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-2 and TL500.
To sum up, each of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The WG-2 using its tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF harder and the Pentax WG-2 will resolve more detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images more aggressively. The more modern WG-2 will have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Pentax WG-2 vs Samsung TL500 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Pentax WG-2 vs Samsung TL500 Specifications
| Pentax Optio WG-2 | Samsung TL500 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Pentax | Samsung |
| Model type | Pentax Optio WG-2 | Samsung TL500 |
| Otherwise known as | - | EX1 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2012-02-07 | 2010-07-09 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/1.8-2.4 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.40 m | 5.20 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 192g (0.42 pounds) | 386g (0.85 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 114 x 63 x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 40 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 19.2 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.1 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 129 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 images | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $350 | $527 |