Pentax WG-10 vs Sony A900
93 Imaging
38 Features
34 Overall
36
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c8b5/8c8b5a43b8dd05db247331e718ba790ba4a76f83" alt="Pentax WG-10 front Pentax WG-10 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0947/b0947af385e09995bd1e56c5e9e9356bb14ab574" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 front"
54 Imaging
66 Features
62 Overall
64
Pentax WG-10 vs Sony A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 167g - 116 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2013
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 895g - 156 x 117 x 82mm
- Introduced October 2008
- Replacement is Sony A99
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Pentax WG-10 vs Sony A900 Overview
Following is a thorough review of the Pentax WG-10 and Sony A900, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Pentax and Sony. There exists a crucial gap between the image resolutions of the WG-10 (14MP) and A900 (25MP) and the WG-10 (1/2.3") and A900 (Full frame) enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The WG-10 was released 4 years after the A900 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Pentax WG-10 being a Compact camera and the Sony A900 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go through a in-depth comparison, below is a simple view of how the WG-10 grades vs the A900 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Pentax WG-10 vs Sony A900 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Pentax WG-10 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A900. The complete galleries are provided at Pentax WG-10 Gallery and Sony A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-10 over the Sony A900
WG-10 | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2013 | ![]() | October 2008 | More modern by 57 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A900 over the Pentax WG-10
A900 | WG-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+692k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax WG-10 and Sony A900
WG-10 | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Pentax WG-10 vs Sony A900 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and size. The Pentax WG-10 has got outside measurements of 116mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Sony A900 has specifications of 156mm x 117mm x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") having a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs).
Take a look at the Pentax WG-10 and Sony A900 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are using at that time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the WG-10 versus the A900.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2dc45/2dc45e89e5fdc4d3e47766941b660483cba13520" alt="Pentax WG-10 vs Sony A900 size comparison Pentax WG-10 vs Sony A900 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-10 and A900 is 93 and 54 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ea7/a6ea73ecd1793c15a53de0141a5eda91d967bd8b" alt="Pentax WG-10 vs Sony A900 top view buttons comparison Pentax WG-10 vs Sony A900 top view buttons comparison"
Pentax WG-10 vs Sony A900 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to see the difference between sensor sizes only by reading through technical specs. The picture here should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-10 and A900.
As you can tell, both the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The WG-10 because of its tinier sensor will make getting shallow DOF more challenging and the Sony A900 will give you greater detail as a result of its extra 11MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The younger WG-10 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db392/db3922731c5fcaab5a095398022f4495e05f739b" alt="Pentax WG-10 vs Sony A900 sensor size comparison Pentax WG-10 vs Sony A900 sensor size comparison"
Pentax WG-10 vs Sony A900 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe95b/fe95b87bb1a2b2e600b20c5ad5f2c9f27ea634ec" alt="Pentax WG-10 vs Sony A900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Pentax WG-10 vs Sony A900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Pentax WG-10 vs Sony A900 Specifications
Pentax WG-10 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Pentax | Sony |
Model type | Pentax WG-10 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 |
Category | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
Introduced | 2013-06-21 | 2008-10-22 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 25MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 6048 x 4032 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | TFT Xtra Fine color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 0.7 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 1.20 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 167 grams (0.37 lb) | 895 grams (1.97 lb) |
Dimensions | 116 x 59 x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 156 x 117 x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 79 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1431 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 260 shots | 880 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
Storage slots | Single | Two |
Price at launch | $0 | $2,736 |