Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh GR III
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
90 Imaging
69 Features
62 Overall
66
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh GR III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed July 2013
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Launched September 2018
- Replaced the Ricoh GR III
- Updated by Ricoh GR III
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh GR III Overview
Below is a detailed overview of the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Ricoh GR III, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Pentax and Ricoh. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the WG-3 GPS (16MP) and GR III (24MP) and the WG-3 GPS (1/2.3") and GR III (APS-C) provide different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe WG-3 GPS was launched 6 years before the GR III and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Pentax WG-3 GPS being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going right into a complete comparison, here is a simple summary of how the WG-3 GPS grades against the GR III with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh GR III Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Pentax WG-3 GPS & Ricoh GR III. The complete galleries are provided at Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery & Ricoh GR III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Ricoh GR III
WG-3 GPS | GR III |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
GR III | WG-3 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2018 | July 2013 | More recent by 63 months | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 460k | Sharper display (+577k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Ricoh GR III
WG-3 GPS | GR III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh GR III Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera often, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Pentax WG-3 GPS provides outside measurements of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR III has dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs).
Examine the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Ricoh GR III in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the WG-3 GPS versus the GR III.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-3 GPS and GR III is 90 and 90 respectively.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh GR III Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to picture the difference in sensor measurements purely by checking out a spec sheet. The graphic underneath may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-3 GPS and GR III.
Clearly, the 2 cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The WG-3 GPS because of its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field tougher and the Ricoh GR III will produce more detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older WG-3 GPS will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh GR III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh GR III Specifications
Pentax WG-3 GPS | Ricoh GR III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Pentax | Ricoh |
Model | Pentax WG-3 GPS | Ricoh GR III |
Type | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2013-07-19 | 2018-09-25 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 102400 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-16 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 6cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 1,037 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.40 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 238g (0.52 lbs) | 257g (0.57 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photographs | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at release | $350 | $900 |