Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh GR III
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97642/97642f005c0d8e683d1835fc201f1ba1eeb0e238" alt="Pentax WG-3 GPS front Pentax WG-3 GPS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3f30/e3f308a0d9434d86db129d3a675997be5821abbe" alt="Ricoh GR III front Ricoh GR III front"
90 Imaging
69 Features
62 Overall
66
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh GR III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed July 2013
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Launched September 2018
- Replaced the Ricoh GR III
- Updated by Ricoh GR III
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh GR III Overview
Below is a detailed overview of the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Ricoh GR III, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Pentax and Ricoh. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the WG-3 GPS (16MP) and GR III (24MP) and the WG-3 GPS (1/2.3") and GR III (APS-C) provide different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The WG-3 GPS was launched 6 years before the GR III and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Pentax WG-3 GPS being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going right into a complete comparison, here is a simple summary of how the WG-3 GPS grades against the GR III with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh GR III Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Pentax WG-3 GPS & Ricoh GR III. The complete galleries are provided at Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery & Ricoh GR III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Ricoh GR III
WG-3 GPS | GR III |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
GR III | WG-3 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2018 | ![]() | July 2013 | More recent by 63 months |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+577k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Ricoh GR III
WG-3 GPS | GR III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen |
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh GR III Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera often, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Pentax WG-3 GPS provides outside measurements of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR III has dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs).
Examine the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Ricoh GR III in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the WG-3 GPS versus the GR III.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/081d0/081d0b93a91bee689c635dac30b4e05cb6fa03dd" alt="Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh GR III size comparison Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh GR III size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-3 GPS and GR III is 90 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a4ff/4a4ffdeffbd9bcbb1f74cc69bffe345f8ddf6ad5" alt="Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh GR III top view buttons comparison Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh GR III top view buttons comparison"
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh GR III Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to picture the difference in sensor measurements purely by checking out a spec sheet. The graphic underneath may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-3 GPS and GR III.
Clearly, the 2 cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The WG-3 GPS because of its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field tougher and the Ricoh GR III will produce more detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older WG-3 GPS will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c04ba/c04ba7fdaadac0a8a62b69bc07084cd2799d901d" alt="Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh GR III sensor size comparison Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh GR III sensor size comparison"
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh GR III Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97ea2/97ea2495cad26573ce9e6d48a386b98a439974f0" alt="Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh GR III Screen and Viewfinder comparison Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh GR III Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh GR III Specifications
Pentax WG-3 GPS | Ricoh GR III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Pentax | Ricoh |
Model | Pentax WG-3 GPS | Ricoh GR III |
Type | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2013-07-19 | 2018-09-25 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 102400 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-16 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 6cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 1,037 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.40 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 238g (0.52 lbs) | 257g (0.57 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photographs | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at release | $350 | $900 |