Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh WG-M1
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced July 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Introduced September 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
The following is a in depth assessment of the Pentax WG-3 GPS versus Ricoh WG-M1, both Waterproof digital cameras by manufacturers Pentax and Ricoh. The image resolution of the WG-3 GPS (16MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is relatively similar and both cameras provide the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-3 GPS was revealed 14 months earlier than the WG-M1 which makes them a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a short overview of how the WG-3 GPS scores against the WG-M1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Pentax WG-3 GPS and Ricoh WG-M1. The full galleries are viewable at Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Ricoh WG-M1
| WG-3 GPS | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focus | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 115k | Sharper screen (+345k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
| WG-M1 | WG-3 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2014 |  | July 2013 | Newer by 14 months |
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Ricoh WG-M1
| WG-3 GPS | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Pentax WG-3 GPS comes with outer dimensions of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-M1 has measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Compare the Pentax WG-3 GPS versus Ricoh WG-M1 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have at that time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the WG-3 GPS vs the WG-M1.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-3 GPS and WG-M1 is 90 and 91 respectively.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to see the difference between sensor dimensions just by reading specifications. The image below should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-3 GPS and WG-M1.
To sum up, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Pentax WG-3 GPS to offer extra detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged WG-3 GPS is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Pentax WG-3 GPS | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Pentax | Ricoh |
| Model type | Pentax WG-3 GPS | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Class | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2013-07-19 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | (1×) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 1.5 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 115 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.40 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 238 gr (0.52 lb) | 190 gr (0.42 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 shots | 350 shots |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $350 | $2,000 |
