Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung TL500
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97642/97642f005c0d8e683d1835fc201f1ba1eeb0e238" alt="Pentax WG-3 GPS front Pentax WG-3 GPS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3208c/3208cbdbdd11e23eae5a341ac80491dad70aec44" alt="Samsung TL500 front Samsung TL500 front"
88 Imaging
34 Features
54 Overall
42
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung TL500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched July 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F1.8-2.4) lens
- 386g - 114 x 63 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2010
- Additionally Known as EX1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung TL500 Overview
Here is a comprehensive assessment of the Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung TL500, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Pentax and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the WG-3 GPS (16MP) and TL500 (10MP) and the WG-3 GPS (1/2.3") and TL500 (1/1.7") enjoy different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The WG-3 GPS was revealed 3 years later than the TL500 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a in depth comparison, below is a concise view of how the WG-3 GPS grades vs the TL500 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung TL500 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Pentax WG-3 GPS & Samsung TL500. The full galleries are provided at Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery & Samsung TL500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Samsung TL500
WG-3 GPS | TL500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2013 | ![]() | July 2010 | Fresher by 37 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL500 over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
TL500 | WG-3 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 614k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+154k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Samsung TL500
WG-3 GPS | TL500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung TL500 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Pentax WG-3 GPS enjoys outside dimensions of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs) while the Samsung TL500 has proportions of 114mm x 63mm x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 386 grams (0.85 lbs).
Examine the Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung TL500 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at the time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the WG-3 GPS vs the TL500.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2fb9/d2fb946558a85ba650662e1bb24ae2e79c22d824" alt="Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung TL500 size comparison Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung TL500 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the WG-3 GPS and TL500 is 90 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f53de/f53de91febc8c34110cf2de4def1269b221fc715" alt="Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung TL500 top view buttons comparison Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung TL500 top view buttons comparison"
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung TL500 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing just by reading through a spec sheet. The graphic below will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-3 GPS and TL500.
Clearly, both of those cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The WG-3 GPS using its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF harder and the Pentax WG-3 GPS will resolve more detail because of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs much more aggressively. The younger WG-3 GPS provides a benefit in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/571a4/571a430e98d9fcf9fff678975e18138bc214efe7" alt="Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung TL500 sensor size comparison Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung TL500 sensor size comparison"
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung TL500 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/355a3/355a3800156e992eee51151712309abb2afba4a7" alt="Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung TL500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung TL500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung TL500 Specifications
Pentax WG-3 GPS | Samsung TL500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Pentax | Samsung |
Model | Pentax WG-3 GPS | Samsung TL500 |
Also referred to as | - | EX1 |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2013-07-19 | 2010-07-09 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/1.8-2.4 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.40 m | 5.20 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 238 gr (0.52 pounds) | 386 gr (0.85 pounds) |
Dimensions | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 114 x 63 x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 40 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 19.2 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.1 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 129 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 pictures | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | SLB-07A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $350 | $527 |