Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma DP3 Merrill
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97642/97642f005c0d8e683d1835fc201f1ba1eeb0e238" alt="Pentax WG-3 GPS front Pentax WG-3 GPS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53260/53260c3f32c0116ecea3ddbd9713300719affe62" alt="Sigma DP3 Merrill front Sigma DP3 Merrill front"
83 Imaging
56 Features
33 Overall
46
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced July 2013
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 75mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Introduced January 2013
- Old Model is Sigma DP2 Merrill
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Pentax WG-3 GPS versus Sigma DP3 Merrill, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Pentax and Sigma. The resolution of the WG-3 GPS (16MP) and the DP3 Merrill (15MP) is pretty close but the WG-3 GPS (1/2.3") and DP3 Merrill (APS-C) provide totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The WG-3 GPS was launched 7 months after the DP3 Merrill so they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Pentax WG-3 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP3 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go into a full comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the WG-3 GPS grades vs the DP3 Merrill in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Pentax WG-3 GPS and Sigma DP3 Merrill. The complete galleries are available at Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery and Sigma DP3 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Sigma DP3 Merrill
WG-3 GPS | DP3 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2013 | ![]() | January 2013 | More modern by 7 months |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP3 Merrill over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
DP3 Merrill | WG-3 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Sigma DP3 Merrill
WG-3 GPS | DP3 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch screen |
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Pentax WG-3 GPS provides exterior dimensions of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs) and the Sigma DP3 Merrill has proportions of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") and a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Contrast the Pentax WG-3 GPS versus Sigma DP3 Merrill in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the WG-3 GPS and the DP3 Merrill.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3b3f/b3b3ff604f2012356090d5b264bf83802d9e1253" alt="Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma DP3 Merrill size comparison Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma DP3 Merrill size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-3 GPS and DP3 Merrill is 90 and 83 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ea3e8/ea3e85f679012c75783237a9828b1ac670fed721" alt="Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma DP3 Merrill top view buttons comparison Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma DP3 Merrill top view buttons comparison"
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to envision the gap in sensor sizes only by viewing technical specs. The picture here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-3 GPS and DP3 Merrill.
As you can tell, each of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The WG-3 GPS featuring a smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field more challenging and the Pentax WG-3 GPS will result in greater detail utilizing its extra 1MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures way more aggressively. The younger WG-3 GPS will have an edge in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/372de/372de83d4653cd4d9d7242d062b4426c64b1638e" alt="Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma DP3 Merrill sensor size comparison Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma DP3 Merrill sensor size comparison"
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/676e1/676e1f180dd14b6e4e886d1e910931f2b5a6ba1f" alt="Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Specifications
Pentax WG-3 GPS | Sigma DP3 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Pentax | Sigma |
Model | Pentax WG-3 GPS | Sigma DP3 Merrill |
Class | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2013-07-19 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4704 x 3136 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 75mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.40 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 640 x 480 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 238 grams (0.52 lb) | 330 grams (0.73 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 shots | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | - |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $350 | $1,353 |