Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80d48/80d4829e27b270a372b152ea9a2e896de139bf15" alt="Pentax WG-3 front Pentax WG-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0394/c039434b1259b0983aa2fa353205f299c35090eb" alt="Ricoh GR Digital III front Ricoh GR Digital III front"
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced July 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Launched July 2009
- Updated by Ricoh GR Digital IV
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview
Here, we are looking at the Pentax WG-3 versus Ricoh GR Digital III, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Pentax and Ricoh. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the WG-3 (16MP) and GR Digital III (10MP) and the WG-3 (1/2.3") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") have totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The WG-3 was released 4 years after the GR Digital III which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple overview of how the WG-3 scores vs the GR Digital III in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Pentax WG-3 and Ricoh GR Digital III. The complete galleries are available at Pentax WG-3 Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
WG-3 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2013 | ![]() | July 2009 | Newer by 49 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Pentax WG-3
GR Digital III | WG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 and Ricoh GR Digital III
WG-3 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly display |
Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Pentax WG-3 enjoys physical dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital III has specifications of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Analyze the Pentax WG-3 versus Ricoh GR Digital III in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the WG-3 against the GR Digital III.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5841b/5841b1759994740287ce98e8de96aef5c204bb56" alt="Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III size comparison Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-3 and GR Digital III is 90 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21171/21171dc6204bcbf27fcce63189d8a789072c633a" alt="Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III top view buttons comparison Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III top view buttons comparison"
Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to see the gap in sensor dimensions only by viewing a spec sheet. The picture here may give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-3 and GR Digital III.
Clearly, each of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The WG-3 due to its smaller sensor will make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Pentax WG-3 will render greater detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more recent WG-3 will have an advantage in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a2cb/3a2cb48d5c476f37c6fbf26f76caf4146f1323d0" alt="Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III sensor size comparison Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III sensor size comparison"
Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e15b1/e15b19869118ff83df19c5588f6429dcd8198201" alt="Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and Viewfinder comparison Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications
Pentax WG-3 | Ricoh GR Digital III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Pentax | Ricoh |
Model type | Pentax WG-3 | Ricoh GR Digital III |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2013-07-19 | 2009-07-27 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | GR engine III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 64 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/1.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 460k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.40 m | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 230g (0.51 pounds) | 208g (0.46 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photos | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $300 | $399 |