Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung HZ30W
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
91 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung HZ30W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched July 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched January 2010
- Also Known as WB600
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung HZ30W Overview
Here is a comprehensive comparison of the Pentax WG-3 versus Samsung HZ30W, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Pentax and Samsung. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the WG-3 (16MP) and HZ30W (12MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe WG-3 was released 3 years later than the HZ30W and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the WG-3 grades versus the HZ30W for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung HZ30W Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Pentax WG-3 & Samsung HZ30W. The complete galleries are available at Pentax WG-3 Gallery & Samsung HZ30W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 over the Samsung HZ30W
| WG-3 | HZ30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2013 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 43 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ30W over the Pentax WG-3
| HZ30W | WG-3 |
|---|
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 and Samsung HZ30W
| WG-3 | HZ30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither includes Touch screen |
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung HZ30W Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Pentax WG-3 features physical dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ30W has measurements of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Examine the Pentax WG-3 versus Samsung HZ30W in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the WG-3 compared to the HZ30W.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-3 and HZ30W is 90 and 91 respectively.
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung HZ30W Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizing only by seeing specifications. The graphic underneath might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-3 and HZ30W.
To sum up, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can count on the Pentax WG-3 to provide greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots more aggressively. The younger WG-3 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung HZ30W Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung HZ30W Specifications
| Pentax WG-3 | Samsung HZ30W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Pentax | Samsung |
| Model type | Pentax WG-3 | Samsung HZ30W |
| Alternative name | - | WB600 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2013-07-19 | 2010-01-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.40 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 gr (0.51 lbs) | 245 gr (0.54 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SC/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $300 | $280 |