Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung SL620
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
94 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced July 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Announced February 2009
- Additionally referred to as PL65
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung SL620 Overview
The following is a in depth review of the Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung SL620, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Pentax and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the WG-3 (16MP) and SL620 (12MP) but they come with the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-3 was brought out 4 years after the SL620 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Pentax WG-3 being a Compact camera and the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving through a full comparison, below is a brief summation of how the WG-3 matches up vs the SL620 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung SL620 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Pentax WG-3 & Samsung SL620. The entire galleries are viewable at Pentax WG-3 Gallery & Samsung SL620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 over the Samsung SL620
| WG-3 | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2013 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 54 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Pentax WG-3
| SL620 | WG-3 |
|---|
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 and Samsung SL620
| WG-3 | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Pentax WG-3 has outside dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Samsung SL620 has dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung SL620 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the WG-3 and the SL620.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-3 and SL620 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by looking at specs. The picture below may give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-3 and SL620.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Pentax WG-3 to give you more detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots far more aggressively. The newer WG-3 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung SL620 Specifications
| Pentax WG-3 | Samsung SL620 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Pentax | Samsung |
| Model | Pentax WG-3 | Samsung SL620 |
| Also Known as | - | PL65 |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2013-07-19 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.40 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) | 168 grams (0.37 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 images | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $300 | $200 |