Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung TL205
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
94 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung TL205 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed July 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.0-5.6) lens
- 177g - 99 x 59 x 20mm
- Released January 2010
- Additionally referred to as PL100
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung TL205 Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Pentax WG-3 versus Samsung TL205, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Pentax and Samsung. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the WG-3 (16MP) and TL205 (12MP) but they feature the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe WG-3 was unveiled 3 years after the TL205 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Pentax WG-3 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL205 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving in to a full comparison, below is a brief overview of how the WG-3 scores vs the TL205 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung TL205 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Pentax WG-3 and Samsung TL205. The full galleries are provided at Pentax WG-3 Gallery and Samsung TL205 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 over the Samsung TL205
| WG-3 | TL205 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2013 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 43 months |
| Manually focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL205 over the Pentax WG-3
| TL205 | WG-3 |
|---|
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 and Samsung TL205
| WG-3 | TL205 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung TL205 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Pentax WG-3 has got outside dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Samsung TL205 has dimensions of 99mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs).
Look at the Pentax WG-3 versus Samsung TL205 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the WG-3 against the TL205.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-3 and TL205 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung TL205 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to picture the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reading specs. The pic underneath may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-3 and TL205.
All in all, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You should count on the Pentax WG-3 to deliver greater detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively. The younger WG-3 provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung TL205 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung TL205 Specifications
| Pentax WG-3 | Samsung TL205 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Pentax | Samsung |
| Model | Pentax WG-3 | Samsung TL205 |
| Also referred to as | - | PL100 |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2013-07-19 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.0-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.40 m | 3.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) | 177 grams (0.39 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 99 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, SD/SDHC Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $300 | $180 |