Pentax X90 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
69 Imaging
35 Features
34 Overall
34
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Pentax X90 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 428g - 111 x 85 x 110mm
- Released July 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
- Later Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Pentax X90 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Pentax X90 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Pentax and Ricoh. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the X90 (12MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe X90 was revealed 4 years earlier than the WG-4 GPS which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Pentax X90 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a thorough comparison, here is a concise view of how the X90 matches up against the WG-4 GPS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax X90 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Pentax X90 & Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The full galleries are viewable at Pentax X90 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax X90 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
X90 | WG-4 GPS |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Pentax X90
WG-4 GPS | X90 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2014 | July 2010 | More modern by 43 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax X90 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
X90 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Pentax X90 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Pentax X90 offers exterior measurements of 111mm x 85mm x 110mm (4.4" x 3.3" x 4.3") along with a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has proportions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check the Pentax X90 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the X90 against the WG-4 GPS.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the X90 and WG-4 GPS is 69 and 90 respectively.
Pentax X90 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to visualise the difference in sensor sizes simply by going through technical specs. The picture below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the X90 and WG-4 GPS.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to show more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged X90 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Pentax X90 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Pentax X90 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
Pentax X90 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Pentax | Ricoh |
Model type | Pentax X90 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Released | 2010-07-06 | 2014-02-05 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Prime | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-676mm (26.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | - | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 428 grams (0.94 lb) | 235 grams (0.52 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 85 x 110mm (4.4" x 3.3" x 4.3") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 photos |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | D-L106 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $350 | $210 |