Pentax X90 vs Samsung WB250F
69 Imaging
35 Features
34 Overall
34
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
Pentax X90 vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 428g - 111 x 85 x 110mm
- Launched July 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
Pentax X90 vs Samsung WB250F Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Pentax X90 vs Samsung WB250F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Pentax and Samsung. The resolution of the X90 (12MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is very well matched and they feature the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe X90 was launched 3 years prior to the WB250F which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Pentax X90 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB250F being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the X90 matches up vs the WB250F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax X90 vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Pentax X90 & Samsung WB250F. The complete galleries are provided at Pentax X90 Gallery & Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax X90 over the Samsung WB250F
X90 | WB250F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Pentax X90
WB250F | X90 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | July 2010 | More modern by 30 months | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Pentax X90 and Samsung WB250F
X90 | WB250F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Pentax X90 vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Pentax X90 features exterior dimensions of 111mm x 85mm x 110mm (4.4" x 3.3" x 4.3") accompanied by a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Samsung WB250F has measurements of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Contrast the Pentax X90 vs Samsung WB250F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the X90 and the WB250F.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the X90 and WB250F is 69 and 93 respectively.
Pentax X90 vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizes just by looking at a spec sheet. The pic here may provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the X90 and WB250F.
As you can see, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Samsung WB250F to resolve greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged X90 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Pentax X90 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Pentax X90 vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
Pentax X90 | Samsung WB250F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Pentax | Samsung |
Model | Pentax X90 | Samsung WB250F |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2010-07-06 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Prime | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-676mm (26.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 428g (0.94 lbs) | 226g (0.50 lbs) |
Dimensions | 111 x 85 x 110mm (4.4" x 3.3" x 4.3") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | D-L106 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $350 | $250 |