Pentax XG-1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
Portability
66 Imaging
40 Features
37 Overall
38
66 Imaging
40 Features
37 Overall
38
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Pentax XG-1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
Pentax XG-1
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1248mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 567g - 119 x 89 x 98mm
- Announced July 2014
Ricoh WG-4 GPS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
- New Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Pentax XG-1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Pentax XG-1 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Pentax and Ricoh. The resolution of the XG-1 (16MP) and the WG-4 GPS (16MP) is relatively well matched and they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe XG-1 was introduced 6 months after the WG-4 GPS so they are of a similar age. Both cameras come with different body type with the Pentax XG-1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the XG-1 grades against the WG-4 GPS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Pentax XG-1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Pentax XG-1 & Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The whole galleries are available at Pentax XG-1 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax XG-1 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| XG-1 | WG-4 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Pentax XG-1
| WG-4 GPS | XG-1 |
|---|
Common features in the Pentax XG-1 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| XG-1 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2014 |  | February 2014 | Similar age |
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Pentax XG-1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Pentax XG-1 provides external dimensions of 119mm x 89mm x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") along with a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Analyze the Pentax XG-1 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use during that time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the XG-1 vs the WG-4 GPS.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the XG-1 and WG-4 GPS is 66 and 90 respectively.
Pentax XG-1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizes simply by looking at technical specs. The picture underneath will give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the XG-1 and WG-4 GPS.
As you can tell, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same MP so you can expect similar quality of photos but you would want to take the age of the products into consideration.
Pentax XG-1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Pentax XG-1
Portrait photography with Ricoh WG-4 GPS
manual focus
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
focusing manually
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
has face detect focusing
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Pentax XG-1 Street photography advice
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Street photography advice
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
heavier than competition in class (567g)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
no moving screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
more heavy than competition in class (235 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax XG-1 as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh WG-4 GPS as a Sports photography camera
incredible zoom range (24-1248mm 52.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
not so great battery power (240 CIPA)
lack of phase detect AF
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
has tracking focus
environment sealing
max fps low (2.0 frames per second)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
low battery life (240 shots)
has no phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Pentax XG-1
Travel photography with Ricoh WG-4 GPS
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
decently wide (24mm)
long reach (1248mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
not so great battery power (240 shots)
heavier than competition in class (567g)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
environment sealing
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
built-in flash
rather wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
low battery life (240 per charge)
more heavy than competition in class (235 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Pentax XG-1 Landscape photography features
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Landscape photography features
manual focus
decently wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16MP)
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
not so great battery power (240 CIPA)
lack of Time Lapse function
focusing manually
rather wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
nice screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
environment sealing
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
lack of manual exposure
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
low battery life (240 shots)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Pentax XG-1
Vlogging with Ricoh WG-4 GPS
decently wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of external mic port
heavier than competition in class (567g)
rather wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
screen is not selfie friendly
missing microphone socket
more heavy than competition in class (235 grams)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Pentax XG-1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
| Pentax XG-1 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Pentax | Ricoh |
| Model type | Pentax XG-1 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2014-07-15 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1248mm (52.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 200k dots | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 9.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Force Off, Flash Auto, Force Flash, Slow Sync., Slow Sync. + Red-Eye, Red-Eye Reduction | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 567 gr (1.25 pounds) | 235 gr (0.52 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 119 x 89 x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photographs | 240 photographs |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LB-060 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $599 | $210 |