Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung HZ15W
66 Imaging
40 Features
37 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fcb78/fcb78625b9bfd044138fde17449eb98eea8ef3dd" alt="Pentax XG-1 front Pentax XG-1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47851/478511a8a927c87f7bc64622b7ea2ec44bf09c1b" alt="Samsung HZ15W front Samsung HZ15W front"
90 Imaging
34 Features
31 Overall
32
Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung HZ15W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1248mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 567g - 119 x 89 x 98mm
- Launched July 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Additionally referred to as WB550
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung HZ15W Overview
Following is a detailed review of the Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung HZ15W, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Pentax and Samsung. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the XG-1 (16MP) and HZ15W (12MP) but they use the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The XG-1 was unveiled 5 years after the HZ15W which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Pentax XG-1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung HZ15W being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the XG-1 matches up versus the HZ15W with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung HZ15W Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Pentax XG-1 & Samsung HZ15W. The full galleries are provided at Pentax XG-1 Gallery & Samsung HZ15W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax XG-1 over the Samsung HZ15W
XG-1 | HZ15W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2014 | ![]() | February 2009 | More modern by 66 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ15W over the Pentax XG-1
HZ15W | XG-1 |
---|
Common features in the Pentax XG-1 and Samsung HZ15W
XG-1 | HZ15W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurement |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Identical display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung HZ15W Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Pentax XG-1 has got exterior dimensions of 119mm x 89mm x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") with a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) while the Samsung HZ15W has sizing of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") having a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Analyze the Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung HZ15W in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at the time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the XG-1 vs the HZ15W.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2229/a222928ede804756a227291c8fc8b47a6455fe4b" alt="Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung HZ15W size comparison Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung HZ15W size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the XG-1 and HZ15W is 66 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0501b/0501b14271b22e559292a243ef5ed13185f24098" alt="Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung HZ15W top view buttons comparison Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung HZ15W top view buttons comparison"
Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung HZ15W Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizes purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture here should give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the XG-1 and HZ15W.
As you can see, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You can expect to see the Pentax XG-1 to offer extra detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The fresher XG-1 provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81201/8120191c05da763355ef0c01c1386c1794a152e7" alt="Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung HZ15W sensor size comparison Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung HZ15W sensor size comparison"
Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung HZ15W Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0e33/a0e33307b8df0d0118a84896034da2e58452de75" alt="Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung HZ15W Screen and Viewfinder comparison Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung HZ15W Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung HZ15W Specifications
Pentax XG-1 | Samsung HZ15W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Pentax | Samsung |
Model type | Pentax XG-1 | Samsung HZ15W |
Otherwise known as | - | WB550 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2014-07-15 | 2009-02-23 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-1248mm (52.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/3.3-5.8 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 200k dots | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 9.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.00 m | 4.70 m |
Flash modes | Force Off, Flash Auto, Force Flash, Slow Sync., Slow Sync. + Red-Eye, Red-Eye Reduction | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 567 grams (1.25 pounds) | 249 grams (0.55 pounds) |
Dimensions | 119 x 89 x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 pictures | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LB-060 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $599 | $330 |