Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung HZ35W
66 Imaging
40 Features
37 Overall
38
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1248mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 567g - 119 x 89 x 98mm
- Released July 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched June 2010
- Additionally referred to as WB650
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Below, we are comparing the Pentax XG-1 and Samsung HZ35W, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Pentax and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the XG-1 (16MP) and HZ35W (12MP) but they feature the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe XG-1 was introduced 4 years after the HZ35W which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Pentax XG-1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a detailed comparison, below is a simple view of how the XG-1 grades vs the HZ35W in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Pentax XG-1 & Samsung HZ35W. The whole galleries are available at Pentax XG-1 Gallery & Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax XG-1 over the Samsung HZ35W
| XG-1 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2014 |  | June 2010 | More modern by 50 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Pentax XG-1
| HZ35W | XG-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 614k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+154k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax XG-1 and Samsung HZ35W
| XG-1 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Pentax XG-1 comes with external measurements of 119mm x 89mm x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") along with a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) and the Samsung HZ35W has proportions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Take a look at the Pentax XG-1 and Samsung HZ35W in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the XG-1 vs the HZ35W.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XG-1 and HZ35W is 66 and 91 respectively.
Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to imagine the gap in sensor sizes only by checking out specs. The pic here may offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the XG-1 and HZ35W.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You can anticipate the Pentax XG-1 to show greater detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more recent XG-1 provides a benefit in sensor technology.
Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Pentax XG-1 | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Pentax | Samsung |
| Model | Pentax XG-1 | Samsung HZ35W |
| Also called as | - | WB650 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2014-07-15 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-1248mm (52.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 200 thousand dot | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 9.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Force Off, Flash Auto, Force Flash, Slow Sync., Slow Sync. + Red-Eye, Red-Eye Reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 567g (1.25 lb) | 245g (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 119 x 89 x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LB-060 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $599 | $300 |