Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Refreshed by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Below is a extended review of the Ricoh CX1 versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof and both are sold by Ricoh. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the CX1 (9MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe CX1 was revealed 6 years prior to the WG-4 GPS and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a more detailed comparison, below is a concise view of how the CX1 matches up against the WG-4 GPS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh CX1 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh CX1 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| CX1 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Ricoh CX1
| WG-4 GPS | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 60 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX1 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| CX1 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX1 provides outer dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has sizing of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh CX1 versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the CX1 vs the WG-4 GPS.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the CX1 and WG-4 GPS is 93 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to visualise the difference between sensor measurements only by reading through specs. The photograph below will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the CX1 and WG-4 GPS.
All in all, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to give you extra detail because of its extra 7MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older CX1 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
| Ricoh CX1 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Ricoh |
| Model | Ricoh CX1 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-02-19 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.3-5.2 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 920k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 180 grams (0.40 pounds) | 235 grams (0.52 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 shots |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | DB-70 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $299 | $210 |