Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung NX1000
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
90 Imaging
62 Features
60 Overall
61
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung NX1000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Announced February 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 222g - 114 x 63 x 37mm
- Released April 2012
- Successor is Samsung NX1100
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung NX1000 Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Ricoh CX1 versus Samsung NX1000, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the CX1 (9MP) and NX1000 (20MP) and the CX1 (1/2.3") and NX1000 (APS-C) come with different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe CX1 was launched 4 years earlier than the NX1000 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh CX1 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX1000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting through a in depth comparison, below is a quick summary of how the CX1 scores against the NX1000 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung NX1000 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh CX1 and Samsung NX1000. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh CX1 Gallery and Samsung NX1000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Samsung NX1000
CX1 | NX1000 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX1000 over the Ricoh CX1
NX1000 | CX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | April 2012 | February 2009 | Newer by 38 months | |
Display resolution | 921k | 920k | Clearer display (+1k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh CX1 and Samsung NX1000
CX1 | NX1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither features Touch display |
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung NX1000 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera often, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Ricoh CX1 enjoys outside dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs) and the Samsung NX1000 has proportions of 114mm x 63mm x 37mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") and a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh CX1 versus Samsung NX1000 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the CX1 against the NX1000.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the CX1 and NX1000 is 93 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung NX1000 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions just by viewing technical specs. The picture below will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the CX1 and NX1000.
As you have seen, each of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The CX1 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh trickier and the Samsung NX1000 will provide you with extra detail utilizing its extra 11 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images much more aggressively. The more aged CX1 will be behind in sensor tech.
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung NX1000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung NX1000 Specifications
Ricoh CX1 | Samsung NX1000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh CX1 | Samsung NX1000 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2009-02-19 | 2012-04-19 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.3-5.2 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 180 gr (0.40 lb) | 222 gr (0.49 lb) |
Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 114 x 63 x 37mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 72 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 840 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 photos |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DB-70 | BC1030 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $299 | $388 |