Clicky

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB50F

Portability
93
Imaging
32
Features
30
Overall
31
Ricoh CX1 front
 
Samsung WB50F front
Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
36
Overall
38

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs

Ricoh CX1
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
  • 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
  • Revealed February 2009
Samsung WB50F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
  • Revealed January 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB50F Overview

Following is a in depth analysis of the Ricoh CX1 versus Samsung WB50F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the CX1 (9MP) and WB50F (16MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The CX1 was announced 5 years earlier than the WB50F which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before going right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the CX1 matches up against the WB50F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Samsung WB50F

 CX1 WB50F 
Screen resolution920k460kSharper screen (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Ricoh CX1

 WB50F CX1 
RevealedJanuary 2014February 2009More modern by 59 months

Common features in the Ricoh CX1 and Samsung WB50F

 CX1 WB50F 
Focus manually Very precise focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen sizing
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Absent Touch friendly screen

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison

If you are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Ricoh CX1 comes with exterior dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Samsung WB50F has proportions of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") and a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).

Contrast the Ricoh CX1 versus Samsung WB50F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have at the time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the CX1 and the WB50F.

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB50F size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the CX1 and WB50F is 93 and 92 respectively.

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB50F top view buttons comparison

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it can be difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizes only by checking out a spec sheet. The image below might offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the CX1 and WB50F.

As you can see, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Samsung WB50F to provide extra detail with its extra 7MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged CX1 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB50F sensor size comparison

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh CX1 Portrait photography info
Samsung WB50F Portrait photography info
25
manual focus
no manual exposure
no external flash support
low resolution (9 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
37
you can focus manually
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
no manual control
can't use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh CX1
Street photography with Samsung WB50F
55
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
62
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (207g)
fixed screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Ricoh CX1 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung WB50F as a Sports photography camera
26
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of shutter priority mode
low resolution (9 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
40
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Ricoh CX1 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung WB50F as a Travel photography camera
59
built-in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
low resolution (9 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
69
lighter than competition in class (207g)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
great zoom (288mm)
missing Timelapse function
does not have selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Ricoh CX1
Landscape photography with Samsung WB50F
42
manual focus
relatively wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
no manual exposure
low resolution (9 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
47
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
no manual control
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
missing Timelapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh CX1 Vlogging features
Samsung WB50F Vlogging features
28
relatively wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
display isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
missing external mic socket
30
reasonably wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (207 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
does not have selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing microphone port
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh CX1 and Samsung WB50F
 Ricoh CX1Samsung WB50F
General Information
Brand Name Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh CX1 Samsung WB50F
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2009-02-19 2014-01-07
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 9MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3456 x 2592 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 80 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-200mm (7.1x) 24-288mm (12.0x)
Max aperture f/3.3-5.2 f/3.1-6.3
Macro focus range 1cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 920k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8 seconds -
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.00 m -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync -
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 180 gr (0.40 pounds) 207 gr (0.46 pounds)
Physical dimensions 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model DB-70 BP70A
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) -
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Launch pricing $299 $180