Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB50F
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Revealed January 2014
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB50F Overview
Following is a in depth analysis of the Ricoh CX1 versus Samsung WB50F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the CX1 (9MP) and WB50F (16MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe CX1 was announced 5 years earlier than the WB50F which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the CX1 matches up against the WB50F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh CX1 and Samsung WB50F. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh CX1 Gallery and Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Samsung WB50F
CX1 | WB50F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Ricoh CX1
WB50F | CX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2014 | February 2009 | More modern by 59 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX1 and Samsung WB50F
CX1 | WB50F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Ricoh CX1 comes with exterior dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Samsung WB50F has proportions of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") and a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh CX1 versus Samsung WB50F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have at the time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the CX1 and the WB50F.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the CX1 and WB50F is 93 and 92 respectively.
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizes only by checking out a spec sheet. The image below might offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the CX1 and WB50F.
As you can see, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Samsung WB50F to provide extra detail with its extra 7MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged CX1 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
Ricoh CX1 | Samsung WB50F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh CX1 | Samsung WB50F |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-02-19 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.3-5.2 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 920k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | - |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 180 gr (0.40 pounds) | 207 gr (0.46 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | DB-70 | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $299 | $180 |