Ricoh CX1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
70 Imaging
63 Features
38 Overall
53
Ricoh CX1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Introduced February 2014
Ricoh CX1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
In this article, we will be reviewing the Ricoh CX1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Sigma. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the CX1 (9MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the CX1 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) come with totally different sensor measurements.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe CX1 was brought out 6 years earlier than the DP2 Quattro which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh CX1 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the CX1 matches up vs the DP2 Quattro in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh CX1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh CX1 and Sigma DP2 Quattro. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh CX1 Gallery and Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
CX1 | DP2 Quattro |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Ricoh CX1
DP2 Quattro | CX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2014 | February 2009 | More modern by 60 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX1 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
CX1 | DP2 Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 920k | Same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither offers Touch screen |
Ricoh CX1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX1 offers exterior dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Quattro has sizing of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") and a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh CX1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the CX1 versus the DP2 Quattro.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the CX1 and DP2 Quattro is 93 and 70 respectively.
Ricoh CX1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to envision the contrast in sensor sizes purely by looking through technical specs. The picture below will give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the CX1 and DP2 Quattro.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The CX1 because of its smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will render extra detail having its extra 11 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged CX1 will be behind in sensor technology.
Ricoh CX1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh CX1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
Ricoh CX1 | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model type | Ricoh CX1 | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2009-02-19 | 2014-02-13 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | TRUE III engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 5424 x 3616 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | 45mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/3.3-5.2 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 180 grams (0.40 pounds) | 395 grams (0.87 pounds) |
Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | DB-70 | BP-51 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $299 | $931 |