Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
![Olympus E-330 front Olympus E-330 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Olympus-E-330.jpg)
![Olympus SP-800 UZ front Olympus SP-800 UZ front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-SP-800-UZ/Olympus-SP-800-UZ-front.jpg)
69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Revealed March 2006
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-330
- Succeeded the Olympus E-300
- Replacement is Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Boost to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Successor is Olympus SP-810 UZ
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Overview
Its time to look closer at the Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. There is a sizeable difference between the resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and SP-800 UZ (14MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and SP-800 UZ (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor measurements.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
The E-330 was unveiled 4 years earlier than the SP-800 UZ and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus SP-800 UZ being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the E-330 scores vs the SP-800 UZ when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-330 and Olympus SP-800 UZ. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-330 Gallery and Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
E-330 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Olympus E-330
SP-800 UZ | E-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2010 | ![]() | March 2006 | Fresher by 47 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 215k | Sharper display (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Olympus SP-800 UZ
E-330 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Absent Touch display |
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-330 comes with outside measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) while the Olympus SP-800 UZ has measurements of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") and a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at the time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-330 and the SP-800 UZ.
![Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ size comparison Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-E-330-vs-Olympus-SP-800-UZ-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-330 and SP-800 UZ is 65 and 69 respectively.
![Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-E-330-vs-Olympus-SP-800-UZ-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizing only by looking at specifications. The visual here should provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-330 and SP-800 UZ.
To sum up, both of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-330 with its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus SP-800 UZ will give extra detail having an extra 7MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos much more aggressively. The older E-330 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
![Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Olympus-E-330-vs-Olympus-SP-800-UZ-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
![Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-E-330-vs-Olympus-SP-800-UZ-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Specifications
Olympus E-330 | Olympus SP-800 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-330 | Olympus SP-800 UZ |
Alternative name | EVOLT E-330 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2006-03-18 | 2010-02-02 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 7 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Full resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | 1600 | 1000 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-840mm (30.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 215k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 12 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.10 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 616 grams (1.36 lb) | 455 grams (1.00 lb) |
Dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $1,100 | $270 |