Ricoh CX1 vs Sony NEX-5R
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
89 Imaging
57 Features
76 Overall
64
Ricoh CX1 vs Sony NEX-5R Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Released February 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 276g - 111 x 59 x 39mm
- Introduced August 2012
- Older Model is Sony NEX-5N
- New Model is Sony NEX-5T
Ricoh CX1 vs Sony NEX-5R Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Ricoh CX1 vs Sony NEX-5R, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Ricoh and Sony. There is a noticeable difference among the resolutions of the CX1 (9MP) and NEX-5R (16MP) and the CX1 (1/2.3") and NEX-5R (APS-C) posses different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe CX1 was brought out 4 years before the NEX-5R and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh CX1 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-5R being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the CX1 grades vs the NEX-5R when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh CX1 vs Sony NEX-5R Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh CX1 & Sony Alpha NEX-5R. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh CX1 Gallery & Sony NEX-5R Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Sony NEX-5R
CX1 | NEX-5R |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-5R over the Ricoh CX1
NEX-5R | CX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2012 | February 2009 | Fresher by 42 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh CX1 and Sony NEX-5R
CX1 | NEX-5R | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen sizing | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 920k | Exact same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Ricoh CX1 vs Sony NEX-5R Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX1 comes with outer measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-5R has sizing of 111mm x 59mm x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") and a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh CX1 vs Sony NEX-5R in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the CX1 against the NEX-5R.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the CX1 and NEX-5R is 93 and 89 respectively.
Ricoh CX1 vs Sony NEX-5R Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to imagine the gap in sensor sizing purely by checking out specifications. The photograph here will give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the CX1 and NEX-5R.
Plainly, both of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The CX1 due to its smaller sensor is going to make achieving bokeh trickier and the Sony NEX-5R will show more detail having its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older CX1 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh CX1 vs Sony NEX-5R Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh CX1 vs Sony NEX-5R Specifications
Ricoh CX1 | Sony Alpha NEX-5R | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh CX1 | Sony Alpha NEX-5R |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2009-02-19 | 2012-08-29 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4912 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 99 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.2 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | Tilt Up 180� Down 50� TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 180g (0.40 lbs) | 276g (0.61 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 111 x 59 x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 78 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.1 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 910 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 photographs |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB-70 | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse shooting | With downloadable app | |
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $299 | $750 |