Ricoh CX1 vs Sony A6400
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
83 Imaging
70 Features
88 Overall
77
Ricoh CX1 vs Sony A6400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2009
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Expand to 102400)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 403g - 120 x 67 x 50mm
- Released January 2019
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh CX1 vs Sony A6400 Overview
In this write-up, we are matching up the Ricoh CX1 versus Sony A6400, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Ricoh and Sony. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the CX1 (9MP) and A6400 (24MP) and the CX1 (1/2.3") and A6400 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe CX1 was launched 11 years before the A6400 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh CX1 being a Compact camera and the Sony A6400 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going in to a thorough comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the CX1 matches up against the A6400 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh CX1 vs Sony A6400 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh CX1 & Sony Alpha a6400. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh CX1 Gallery & Sony A6400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Sony A6400
| CX1 | A6400 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony A6400 over the Ricoh CX1
| A6400 | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2019 |  | February 2009 | Fresher by 120 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 920k | Clearer display (+2k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies | ||
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh CX1 and Sony A6400
| CX1 | A6400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display size |
Ricoh CX1 vs Sony A6400 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh CX1 has got external dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Sony A6400 has dimensions of 120mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 403 grams (0.89 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh CX1 versus Sony A6400 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the CX1 versus the A6400.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the CX1 and A6400 is 93 and 83 respectively.
Ricoh CX1 vs Sony A6400 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing just by going over technical specs. The visual below might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the CX1 and A6400.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The CX1 because of its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF more difficult and the Sony A6400 will offer you extra detail utilizing its extra 15 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images a little more aggressively. The older CX1 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh CX1 vs Sony A6400 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Ricoh CX1 vs Sony A6400 Specifications
| Ricoh CX1 | Sony Alpha a6400 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model | Ricoh CX1 | Sony Alpha a6400 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2009-02-19 | 2019-01-15 |
| Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 32000 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 102400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 425 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens focal range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.2 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 121 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 920k dot | 922k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 11.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Off, auto, on, slow sync, rear sync, redeye reduction, wireless, hi-speed sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264, XAVC-S |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 180g (0.40 pounds) | 403g (0.89 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 120 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 83 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 24.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.6 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 1431 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 410 photographs |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | DB-70 | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick DUO (UHS-I compliant) |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $299 | $898 |
