Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-20
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
93 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 164g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-20 Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Ricoh CX2 and Ricoh WG-20, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof and they are both offered by Ricoh. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the CX2 (9MP) and WG-20 (14MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe CX2 was unveiled 5 years prior to the WG-20 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the CX2 matches up versus the WG-20 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-20 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh CX2 & Ricoh WG-20. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh CX2 Gallery & Ricoh WG-20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Ricoh WG-20
| CX2 | WG-20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-20 over the Ricoh CX2
| WG-20 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 | August 2009 | More recent by 54 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Ricoh WG-20
| CX2 | WG-20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-20 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and size. The Ricoh CX2 features outside dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-20 has specifications of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh CX2 and Ricoh WG-20 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the CX2 compared to the WG-20.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the CX2 and WG-20 is 93 and 93 respectively.
Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-20 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements merely by viewing a spec sheet. The photograph here may give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the CX2 and WG-20.
As you can see, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can count on the Ricoh WG-20 to render extra detail having an extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older CX2 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-20 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-20 Specifications
| Ricoh CX2 | Ricoh WG-20 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Ricoh |
| Model | Ricoh CX2 | Ricoh WG-20 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-08-20 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m (ISO 400) | 4.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30p, 15p), 640 x 480 (30p, 15p), 320 x 240 (30p, 15p) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 185 grams (0.41 lbs) | 164 grams (0.36 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 260 photos |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | DB-70 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $341 | $370 |