Clicky

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung ST65

Portability
93
Imaging
32
Features
35
Overall
33
Ricoh CX2 front
 
Samsung ST65 front
Portability
99
Imaging
37
Features
19
Overall
29

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung ST65 Key Specs

Ricoh CX2
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
  • Revealed August 2009
Samsung ST65
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Launched January 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung ST65 Overview

Lets look a bit more closely at the Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung ST65, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the CX2 (9MP) and ST65 (14MP) but they come with the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The CX2 was brought out 17 months earlier than the ST65 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before diving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the CX2 scores vs the ST65 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Samsung ST65

 CX2 ST65 
Manually focus Very precise focusing
Screen resolution920k460kSharper screen (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Ricoh CX2

 ST65 CX2 
LaunchedJanuary 2011August 2009More modern by 17 months

Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Samsung ST65

 CX2 ST65 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen sizing
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch screen Lacking Touch screen

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung ST65 Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Ricoh CX2 has got physical dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST65 has measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Look at the Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung ST65 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the CX2 versus the ST65.

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung ST65 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the CX2 and ST65 is 93 and 99 respectively.

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung ST65 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung ST65 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it's difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes purely by looking at specifications. The pic below might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the CX2 and ST65.

Plainly, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Samsung ST65 to give greater detail having its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots a little more aggressively. The more aged CX2 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung ST65 sensor size comparison

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung ST65 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung ST65 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Ricoh CX2
Portrait photography with Samsung ST65
25
has manual focus
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (9MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
28
good resolution (14MP)
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh CX2
Street photography with Samsung ST65
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors (185g)
screen is fixed
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
49
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
low max ISO (0)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Ricoh CX2 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung ST65 as a Sports photography camera
26
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
megapixel count low (9MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
26
good resolution (14MP)
focal length is fixed (()mm)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Ricoh CX2 Travel photography advice
Samsung ST65 Travel photography advice
66
lighter than competitors (185g)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
megapixel count low (9MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
71
good resolution (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
very good max aperture (f)
no Time Lapse function
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh CX2 Landscape photography highlights
Samsung ST65 Landscape photography highlights
42
has manual focus
reasonably wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
manual exposure not possible
megapixel count low (9MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
37
very good max aperture (f)
good sized screen (3 inches)
good resolution (14MP)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (()mm)
manual exposure not possible
lack of image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
low max ISO (0)
has no RAW support
no Time Lapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh CX2 Vlogging information
Samsung ST65 Vlogging information
30
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors (185g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
missing external microphone socket
27
very good max aperture (f)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
no mic port
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung ST65 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh CX2 and Samsung ST65
 Ricoh CX2Samsung ST65
General Information
Make Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh CX2 Samsung ST65
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Ultracompact
Revealed 2009-08-20 2011-01-19
Body design Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 -
Highest resolution 3456 x 2592 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 80 -
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-300mm (10.7x) ()
Max aperture f/3.5-5.6 -
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of display 920k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8 seconds 8 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.00 m (ISO 400) -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 185 grams (0.41 pounds) -
Dimensions 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model DB-70 -
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) -
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal -
Storage slots 1 1
Retail price $341 $130