Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung WB150F
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
93 Imaging
37 Features
42 Overall
39
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung WB150F Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung WB150F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a significant gap between the image resolutions of the CX2 (9MP) and WB150F (14MP) but they feature the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe CX2 was manufactured 3 years earlier than the WB150F and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a complete comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the CX2 scores against the WB150F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung WB150F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh CX2 and Samsung WB150F. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh CX2 Gallery and Samsung WB150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Samsung WB150F
CX2 | WB150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Ricoh CX2
WB150F | CX2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2012 | August 2009 | Fresher by 29 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Samsung WB150F
CX2 | WB150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen size | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Ricoh CX2 offers exterior measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) and the Samsung WB150F has measurements of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
Check the Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung WB150F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose during that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the CX2 vs the WB150F.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the CX2 and WB150F is 93 and 93 respectively.
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizing merely by reviewing specifications. The photograph below should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the CX2 and WB150F.
To sum up, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Samsung WB150F to offer you more detail due to its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The older CX2 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung WB150F Specifications
Ricoh CX2 | Samsung WB150F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh CX2 | Samsung WB150F |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2009-08-20 | 2012-01-09 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 16 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m (ISO 400) | 3.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 185 grams (0.41 lbs) | 188 grams (0.41 lbs) |
Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | DB-70 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $341 | $230 |