Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung WB800F
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Released August 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Below, we are comparing the Ricoh CX2 and Samsung WB800F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There is a sizable difference between the resolutions of the CX2 (9MP) and WB800F (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe CX2 was manufactured 4 years before the WB800F which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the CX2 grades against the WB800F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh CX2 & Samsung WB800F. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh CX2 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Samsung WB800F
| CX2 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Ricoh CX2
| WB800F | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | August 2009 | More modern by 41 months |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Samsung WB800F
| CX2 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Ricoh CX2 provides external measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) and the Samsung WB800F has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh CX2 and Samsung WB800F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at the time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the CX2 versus the WB800F.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the CX2 and WB800F is 93 and 92 respectively.
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizes purely by looking at specifications. The image here may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the CX2 and WB800F.
Plainly, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Samsung WB800F to give greater detail due to its extra 7MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged CX2 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Ricoh CX2 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh CX2 | Samsung WB800F |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-08-20 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 16s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m (ISO 400) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 185 grams (0.41 lb) | 218 grams (0.48 lb) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | DB-70 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $341 | $300 |