Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A350
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/103c7/103c75a67dcbfed70caf5bb728c64082ed228093" alt="Ricoh CX2 front Ricoh CX2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12c81/12c817401ce2f8957e577f0ee287d1054036861a" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 front"
62 Imaging
52 Features
47 Overall
50
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Released August 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 674g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Announced June 2008
- Replacement is Sony A380
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A350 Overview
Lets look closer at the Ricoh CX2 versus Sony A350, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Ricoh and Sony. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the CX2 (9MP) and A350 (14MP) and the CX2 (1/2.3") and A350 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The CX2 was launched 15 months after the A350 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera and the Sony A350 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief overview of how the CX2 scores against the A350 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A350 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh CX2 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A350. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh CX2 Gallery & Sony A350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Sony A350
CX2 | A350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2009 | ![]() | June 2008 | More modern by 15 months |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A350 over the Ricoh CX2
A350 | CX2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Sony A350
CX2 | A350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Absent Touch display |
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A350 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Ricoh CX2 offers external measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) and the Sony A350 has specifications of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 674 grams (1.49 lbs).
See the Ricoh CX2 versus Sony A350 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the CX2 and the A350.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1ee6d/1ee6deec4398576ed9b1ad860d808b312f4628a4" alt="Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A350 size comparison Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A350 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the CX2 and A350 is 93 and 62 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c25c6/c25c6d68ea8b77bb7cc6ab188a7e13011459b730" alt="Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A350 top view buttons comparison Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A350 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A350 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizes purely by checking out technical specs. The image here will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the CX2 and A350.
As you have seen, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The CX2 featuring a smaller sensor will make shooting shallow DOF trickier and the Sony A350 will show more detail utilizing its extra 5MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics far more aggressively. The more recent CX2 will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0fc1/f0fc16d216365f782e3e131ada9420ff93c3d07a" alt="Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A350 sensor size comparison Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A350 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A350 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23b3a/23b3ad40b075d949f83c16dc7a3409706085b67e" alt="Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A350 Specifications
Ricoh CX2 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh CX2 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2009-08-20 | 2008-06-06 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4592 x 3056 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m (ISO 400) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 185 gr (0.41 lbs) | 674 gr (1.49 lbs) |
Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 65 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 595 |
Other | ||
Battery ID | DB-70 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $341 | $600 |