Clicky

Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A350

Portability
93
Imaging
32
Features
35
Overall
33
Ricoh CX2 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 front
Portability
62
Imaging
52
Features
47
Overall
50

Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A350 Key Specs

Ricoh CX2
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
  • Released August 2009
Sony A350
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 674g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
  • Announced June 2008
  • Replacement is Sony A380
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A350 Overview

Lets look closer at the Ricoh CX2 versus Sony A350, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Ricoh and Sony. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the CX2 (9MP) and A350 (14MP) and the CX2 (1/2.3") and A350 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor measurements.

Photography Glossary

The CX2 was launched 15 months after the A350 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera and the Sony A350 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before diving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief overview of how the CX2 scores against the A350 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Sony A350

 CX2 A350 
AnnouncedAugust 2009June 2008More modern by 15 months
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution920k230kSharper display (+690k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony A350 over the Ricoh CX2

 A350 CX2 
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Sony A350

 CX2 A350 
Manual focus Dial exact focusing
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch display Absent Touch display

Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A350 Physical Comparison

When you are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Ricoh CX2 offers external measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) and the Sony A350 has specifications of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 674 grams (1.49 lbs).

See the Ricoh CX2 versus Sony A350 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the CX2 and the A350.

Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A350 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the CX2 and A350 is 93 and 62 respectively.

Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A350 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A350 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it can be difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizes purely by checking out technical specs. The image here will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the CX2 and A350.

As you have seen, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The CX2 featuring a smaller sensor will make shooting shallow DOF trickier and the Sony A350 will show more detail utilizing its extra 5MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics far more aggressively. The more recent CX2 will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.

Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A350 sensor size comparison

Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A350 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh CX2 Portrait photography information
Sony A350 Portrait photography information
25
has manual focus
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution low (9MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
71
focusing manually
decent MP (14 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh CX2
Street photography with Sony A350
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (185g)
no articulating screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
66
has a tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
more heavy than others (674g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Ricoh CX2 Sports photography details
Sony A350 Sports photography details
26
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
sensor resolution low (9 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
66
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent MP (14MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports phase detect AF
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Ricoh CX2 Travel photography factors
Sony A350 Travel photography factors
66
lighter than average (185g)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
sensor resolution low (9 megapixels)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
51
decent MP (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
missing Timelapse mode
more heavy than others (674 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh CX2 Landscape photography advice
Sony A350 Landscape photography advice
42
has manual focus
reasonably wide (28mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
manual exposure not possible
sensor resolution low (9 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
64
focusing manually
swap lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent MP (14MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
tiny screen (2.7")
missing Timelapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh CX2 as a Vlogging camera
Sony A350 as a Vlogging camera
30
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (185g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
video res low (640 x 480 pxls)
no external microphone support
9
can't record video
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A350 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh CX2 and Sony A350
 Ricoh CX2Sony Alpha DSLR-A350
General Information
Manufacturer Ricoh Sony
Model type Ricoh CX2 Sony Alpha DSLR-A350
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Entry-Level DSLR
Released 2009-08-20 2008-06-06
Body design Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 9MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3456 x 2592 4592 x 3056
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens zoom range 28-300mm (10.7x) -
Largest aperture f/3.5-5.6 -
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Total lenses - 143
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen sizing 3 inch 2.7 inch
Screen resolution 920k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.49x
Features
Min shutter speed 8 seconds 30 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed - 3.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.00 m (ISO 400) 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) -
Maximum video resolution 640x480 None
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 185 gr (0.41 lbs) 674 gr (1.49 lbs)
Dimensions 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 65
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.6
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 11.5
DXO Low light rating not tested 595
Other
Battery ID DB-70 -
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at release $341 $600