Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh GR III
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
90 Imaging
69 Features
62 Overall
66
Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh GR III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched June 2010
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Revealed September 2018
- Earlier Model is Ricoh GR III
- Newer Model is Ricoh GR III
Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh GR III Overview
Let's look much closer at the Ricoh CX3 and Ricoh GR III, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact and both of them are offered by Ricoh. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the CX3 (10MP) and GR III (24MP) and the CX3 (1/2.3") and GR III (APS-C) possess totally different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe CX3 was introduced 9 years prior to the GR III and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh CX3 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving in to a complete comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the CX3 scores vs the GR III when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh GR III Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh CX3 & Ricoh GR III. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh CX3 Gallery & Ricoh GR III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Ricoh GR III
CX3 | GR III |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Ricoh CX3
GR III | CX3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2018 | June 2010 | More recent by 100 months | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 920k | Clearer screen (+117k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh CX3 and Ricoh GR III
CX3 | GR III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh GR III Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and measurements. The Ricoh CX3 offers external dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR III has proportions of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh CX3 and Ricoh GR III in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the CX3 vs the GR III.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the CX3 and GR III is 92 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh GR III Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to visualise the difference in sensor measurements purely by going through specifications. The graphic underneath may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the CX3 and GR III.
Plainly, each of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The CX3 having a smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF more difficult and the Ricoh GR III will produce more detail using its extra 14MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The older CX3 will be behind in sensor technology.
Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh GR III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh GR III Specifications
Ricoh CX3 | Ricoh GR III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Ricoh |
Model | Ricoh CX3 | Ricoh GR III |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2010-06-16 | 2018-09-25 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 24MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 6000 x 4000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 102400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/2.8-16 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 6cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 920k dots | 1,037k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 206g (0.45 lbs) | 257g (0.57 lbs) |
Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | DB-100 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $329 | $900 |