Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh WG-30W
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh WG-30W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched June 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 194g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed October 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh WG-30W Overview
Below is a thorough overview of the Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh WG-30W, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof and they are both created by Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the CX3 (10MP) and WG-30W (16MP) but they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe CX3 was introduced 5 years earlier than the WG-30W and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a thorough comparison, below is a simple summary of how the CX3 scores vs the WG-30W with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh WG-30W Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh CX3 & Ricoh WG-30W. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh CX3 Gallery & Ricoh WG-30W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Ricoh WG-30W
| CX3 | WG-30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30W over the Ricoh CX3
| WG-30W | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | October 2014 |  | June 2010 | More recent by 52 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX3 and Ricoh WG-30W
| CX3 | WG-30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither has Touch display |
Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh WG-30W Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and proportions. The Ricoh CX3 has physical dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-30W has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh WG-30W in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is the front view size comparison of the CX3 and the WG-30W.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the CX3 and WG-30W is 92 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh WG-30W Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to envision the gap between sensor measurements purely by reading specifications. The visual underneath will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the CX3 and WG-30W.
To sum up, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-30W to offer you more detail using its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will help you crop photos far more aggressively. The older CX3 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh WG-30W Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh WG-30W Specifications
| Ricoh CX3 | Ricoh WG-30W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Ricoh |
| Model | Ricoh CX3 | Ricoh WG-30W |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2010-06-16 | 2014-10-09 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206g (0.45 pounds) | 194g (0.43 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photos |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | DB-100 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $329 | $280 |