Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A230
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b47f9/b47f930de28b117873fba531eee680f0fd88065c" alt="Ricoh CX3 front Ricoh CX3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88116/88116e64f46e39b4199ab42d569c8a4fa375dbc2" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A230 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A230 front"
69 Imaging
50 Features
40 Overall
46
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A230 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched June 2010
(Full Review)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A230 Overview
Following is a comprehensive analysis of the Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A230, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Ricoh and Sony. The sensor resolution of the CX3 (10MP) and the A230 (10MP) is fairly close but the CX3 (1/2.3") and A230 (APS-C) offer different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The CX3 was released 14 months after the A230 making them a generation away from one another. Both cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh CX3 being a Compact camera and the Sony A230 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go into a complete comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the CX3 scores vs the A230 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A230 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh CX3 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A230. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh CX3 Gallery and Sony A230 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Sony A230
CX3 | A230 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2010 | ![]() | May 2009 | More modern by 14 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A230 over the Ricoh CX3
A230 | CX3 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh CX3 and Sony A230
CX3 | A230 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Lack of Touch display |
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A230 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX3 has got exterior measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Sony A230 has sizing of 128mm x 97mm x 68mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.7") along with a weight of 490 grams (1.08 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A230 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is a front view scale comparison of the CX3 and the A230.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9134f/9134fa667408f31dc2c158ee86c1f8aff24afe2a" alt="Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A230 size comparison Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A230 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the CX3 and A230 is 92 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06c08/06c087f9f5f4101bb99bbafb131efe47d595f63d" alt="Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A230 top view buttons comparison Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A230 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A230 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes purely by looking through technical specs. The picture here will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the CX3 and A230.
As you have seen, each of the cameras come with the identical megapixels but different sensor sizes. The CX3 offers the smaller sensor which will make getting shallower DOF harder. The more recent CX3 provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd44e/dd44e2959e334ff3e798cee34fce3a490bc4754b" alt="Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A230 sensor size comparison Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A230 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A230 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c5b3/3c5b3fae3855df3d335e94e60c4ac2ee3e627093" alt="Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A230 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A230 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A230 Specifications
Ricoh CX3 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A230 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh CX3 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A230 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2010-06-16 | 2009-05-18 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3872 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 10.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 206 grams (0.45 lb) | 490 grams (1.08 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 128 x 97 x 68mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 63 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.3 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 531 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 230 photos |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DB-100 | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $329 | $569 |