Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-5T
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
89 Imaging
58 Features
79 Overall
66
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-5T Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Released June 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 276g - 111 x 59 x 39mm
- Launched August 2013
- Old Model is Sony NEX-5R
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-5T Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-5T, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Ricoh and Sony. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the CX3 (10MP) and NEX-5T (16MP) and the CX3 (1/2.3") and NEX-5T (APS-C) possess totally different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe CX3 was manufactured 4 years earlier than the NEX-5T which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh CX3 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-5T being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go through a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick overview of how the CX3 grades vs the NEX-5T in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-5T Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh CX3 and Sony Alpha NEX-5T. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh CX3 Gallery and Sony NEX-5T Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Sony NEX-5T
CX3 | NEX-5T |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-5T over the Ricoh CX3
NEX-5T | CX3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2013 | June 2010 | More modern by 38 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 920k | Crisper screen (+2k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh CX3 and Sony NEX-5T
CX3 | NEX-5T | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen size |
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-5T Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Ricoh CX3 has got physical dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-5T has specifications of 111mm x 59mm x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
See the Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-5T in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the CX3 against the NEX-5T.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the CX3 and NEX-5T is 92 and 89 respectively.
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-5T Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizes only by looking at technical specs. The picture here may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the CX3 and NEX-5T.
As you can tell, both cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The CX3 featuring a tinier sensor will make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Sony NEX-5T will give greater detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged CX3 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-5T Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-5T Specifications
Ricoh CX3 | Sony Alpha NEX-5T | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh CX3 | Sony Alpha NEX-5T |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2010-06-16 | 2013-08-27 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4912 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 99 |
Cross focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 920k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | - | Tilt Up 180° Down 50° TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 7.00 m (ISO100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x1080 (60p/60i/24p) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 206 gr (0.45 lb) | 276 gr (0.61 lb) |
Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 111 x 59 x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 78 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.0 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1015 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 photos |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DB-100 | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes ((10/2 sec. delay), Self-timer (Cont.) (with 10 sec. delay; 3/5 exposures)) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $329 | $400 |