Ricoh CX3 vs Sony QX1
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
90 Imaging
62 Features
48 Overall
56
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony QX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched June 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 216g - 74 x 70 x 53mm
- Released September 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh CX3 vs Sony QX1 Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Ricoh CX3 vs Sony QX1, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Lens-style by companies Ricoh and Sony. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the CX3 (10MP) and QX1 (20MP) and the CX3 (1/2.3") and QX1 (APS-C) posses different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe CX3 was manufactured 5 years before the QX1 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh CX3 being a Compact camera and the Sony QX1 being a Lens-style camera.
Before delving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the CX3 matches up vs the QX1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh CX3 vs Sony QX1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh CX3 & Sony Alpha QX1. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh CX3 Gallery & Sony QX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Sony QX1
| CX3 | QX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" | " | Larger display (+3") | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 0k | Sharper display (+920k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX1 over the Ricoh CX3
| QX1 | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2014 | June 2010 | More recent by 51 months | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh CX3 and Sony QX1
| CX3 | QX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony QX1 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh CX3 features physical dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Sony QX1 has dimensions of 74mm x 70mm x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") and a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh CX3 vs Sony QX1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the CX3 compared to the QX1.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the CX3 and QX1 is 92 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony QX1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to picture the difference in sensor measurements just by looking through technical specs. The photograph below will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the CX3 and QX1.
As you can tell, each of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The CX3 due to its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Sony QX1 will provide you with more detail due to its extra 10MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos more aggressively. The older CX3 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony QX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony QX1 Specifications
| Ricoh CX3 | Sony Alpha QX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model type | Ricoh CX3 | Sony Alpha QX1 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Lens-style |
| Launched | 2010-06-16 | 2014-09-03 |
| Body design | Compact | Lens-style |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.2 x 15.4mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 357.3mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5456 x 3632 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 16000 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.6 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | - |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 0 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 4.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 4.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, rear sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 206g (0.45 pounds) | 216g (0.48 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 74 x 70 x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 440 images |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | DB-100 | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $329 | $500 |