Clicky

Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
34
Overall
34
Ricoh CX4 front
 
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front
Portability
77
Imaging
52
Features
31
Overall
43

Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs

Ricoh CX4
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
  • Released August 2010
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 50mm (F2.5) lens
  • 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
  • Announced November 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview

Let's look much closer at the Ricoh CX4 versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless and both are created by Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the CX4 (10MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) is very similar but the CX4 (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) posses totally different sensor size.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The CX4 was unveiled 10 months later than the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh CX4 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting into a full comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the CX4 grades against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 CX4 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
AnnouncedAugust 2010November 2009More recent by 10 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Ricoh CX4

 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro CX4 

Common features in the Ricoh CX4 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 CX4 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
Manually focus Dial accurate focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display size
Display resolution920k920kExact same display resolution
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither offers Touch friendly display

Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison

If you're looking to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Ricoh CX4 offers external measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has specifications of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).

Compare the Ricoh CX4 versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the CX4 versus the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the CX4 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 92 and 77 respectively.

Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro top view buttons comparison

Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison

Often, it's tough to see the difference between sensor measurements purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The visual below should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the CX4 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

As you can see, both of those cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The CX4 having a tinier sensor will make getting shallower depth of field tougher and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro will deliver more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos more aggressively. The newer CX4 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.

Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro sensor size comparison

Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh CX4 Portrait photography details
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Portrait photography details
27
you can focus manually
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
sensor resolution low (10MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
55
focusing manually
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports RAW files
no liveview feature
low resolution sensor (12MP)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Ricoh CX4 Street photography details
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Street photography details
61
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (205 grams)
fixed screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
62
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports RAW files
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Ricoh CX4 Sports photography highlights
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sports photography highlights
25
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
32
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (50mm)
no liveview feature
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
terrible battery pack (320 per charge)
does not have phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Ricoh CX4
Travel photography with Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
66
lighter than average (205g)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
great zoom (300mm)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
49
flash built-in
terrible battery pack (320 CIPA)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh CX4 Landscape photography highlights
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Landscape photography highlights
42
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
no manual exposure
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
46
focusing manually
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports RAW files
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (50mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
no liveview feature
does not have image stabilization
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
terrible battery pack (320 shots)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh CX4 Vlogging info
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Vlogging info
30
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (205g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have mic port
20
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external mic jack
Photography Glossary

Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh CX4 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
 Ricoh CX4Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
General Information
Make Ricoh Ricoh
Model Ricoh CX4 Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced Mirrorless
Released 2010-08-19 2009-11-10
Body design Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by Smooth Imaging Engine IV GR engine III
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 4288 x 2848
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 100 200
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-300mm (10.7x) 50mm (1x)
Highest aperture f/3.5-5.6 f/2.5
Macro focus distance 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 920k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Min shutter speed 8s 180s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/3200s
Continuous shutter speed 5.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 4.00 m 3.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 205g (0.45 pounds) 453g (1.00 pounds)
Physical dimensions 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 320 images
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery model DB-100 -
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Launch cost $211 $566