Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Released August 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Announced November 2009
Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Let's look much closer at the Ricoh CX4 versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless and both are created by Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the CX4 (10MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) is very similar but the CX4 (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) posses totally different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe CX4 was unveiled 10 months later than the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh CX4 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting into a full comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the CX4 grades against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh CX4 & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh CX4 Gallery & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
CX4 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2010 | November 2009 | More recent by 10 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Ricoh CX4
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | CX4 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh CX4 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
CX4 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display size | |
Display resolution | 920k | 920k | Exact same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Ricoh CX4 offers external measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has specifications of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh CX4 versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the CX4 versus the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the CX4 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 92 and 77 respectively.
Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to see the difference between sensor measurements purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The visual below should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the CX4 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
As you can see, both of those cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The CX4 having a tinier sensor will make getting shallower depth of field tougher and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro will deliver more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos more aggressively. The newer CX4 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Ricoh CX4 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Ricoh |
Model | Ricoh CX4 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2010-08-19 | 2009-11-10 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | GR engine III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 2848 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 50mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/2.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8s | 180s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/3200s |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 205g (0.45 pounds) | 453g (1.00 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 images |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DB-100 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $211 | $566 |