Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung SL102
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
- Alternate Name is ES55
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung SL102, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the CX4 (10MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is very close and they use the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe CX4 was announced 20 months later than the SL102 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a comprehensive comparison, below is a short highlight of how the CX4 matches up against the SL102 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh CX4 & Samsung SL102. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh CX4 Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Samsung SL102
| CX4 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2010 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 20 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Ricoh CX4
| SL102 | CX4 |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh CX4 and Samsung SL102
| CX4 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither contains Touch display |
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh CX4 has got outside dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung SL102 has measurements of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung SL102 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at that moment. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the CX4 against the SL102.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the CX4 and SL102 is 92 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to envision the gap in sensor measurements only by viewing specifications. The graphic below may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the CX4 and SL102.
Plainly, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the identical megapixels therefore you can expect comparable quality of files but you should always factor the launch date of the cameras into account. The newer CX4 will have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Ricoh CX4 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh CX4 | Samsung SL102 |
| Also Known as | - | ES55 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2010-08-19 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lb) | 116 gr (0.26 lb) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | DB-100 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $211 | $130 |