Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL205
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e742/4e74284e98f8a2f698e6b96487e93d8958a78f02" alt="Ricoh CX4 front Ricoh CX4 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ce2e/7ce2ede9fa2768a825fe05b5a60a4314f7a7f1a8" alt="Samsung TL205 front Samsung TL205 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL205 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Released August 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.0-5.6) lens
- 177g - 99 x 59 x 20mm
- Released January 2010
- Also Known as PL100
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL205 Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL205, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the CX4 (10MP) and the TL205 (12MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The CX4 was manufactured 8 months later than the TL205 so they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh CX4 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL205 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick summation of how the CX4 matches up against the TL205 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL205 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh CX4 and Samsung TL205. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh CX4 Gallery and Samsung TL205 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Samsung TL205
CX4 | TL205 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2010 | ![]() | January 2010 | Fresher by 8 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL205 over the Ricoh CX4
TL205 | CX4 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh CX4 and Samsung TL205
CX4 | TL205 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Missing Touch screen |
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL205 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera often, you should factor in its weight and size. The Ricoh CX4 comes with outside measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung TL205 has specifications of 99mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL205 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the CX4 vs the TL205.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82919/82919d34957df545c77ea1c24f126f72e54cb28f" alt="Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL205 size comparison Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL205 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the CX4 and TL205 is 92 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e425d/e425da527258762c41b1d17c0994c23b4d58fea0" alt="Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL205 top view buttons comparison Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL205 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL205 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to envision the difference between sensor sizing purely by checking specifications. The visual underneath may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the CX4 and TL205.
Plainly, both cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Samsung TL205 to give greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more recent CX4 is going to have a benefit in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2d39/b2d397bfc1020e0c92744ebb5f3bfb5889f0abf6" alt="Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL205 sensor size comparison Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL205 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL205 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fec6d/fec6dfa270bad46af39173d18efa1cc102d39fb3" alt="Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL205 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL205 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL205 Specifications
Ricoh CX4 | Samsung TL205 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh CX4 | Samsung TL205 |
Alternative name | - | PL100 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Released | 2010-08-19 | 2010-01-06 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.0-5.6 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 3.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lb) | 177 gr (0.39 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 99 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | DB-100 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, SD/SDHC Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $211 | $180 |