Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL220
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
95 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Released August 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 169g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Revealed August 2009
- Alternative Name is ST500
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL220 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Ricoh CX4 and Samsung TL220, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the CX4 (10MP) and the TL220 (12MP) is fairly similar and both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe CX4 was manufactured 13 months after the TL220 making them a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the CX4 matches up against the TL220 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL220 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh CX4 & Samsung TL220. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh CX4 Gallery & Samsung TL220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Samsung TL220
| CX4 | TL220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2010 |  | August 2009 | More modern by 13 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL220 over the Ricoh CX4
| TL220 | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh CX4 and Samsung TL220
| CX4 | TL220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL220 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh CX4 offers external dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung TL220 has dimensions of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") and a weight of 169 grams (0.37 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh CX4 and Samsung TL220 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the CX4 compared to the TL220.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the CX4 and TL220 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL220 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizes only by reading specs. The image here will give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the CX4 and TL220.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Samsung TL220 to offer you extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The fresher CX4 will have an advantage in sensor technology.
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL220 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL220 Specifications
| Ricoh CX4 | Samsung TL220 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh CX4 | Samsung TL220 |
| Also referred to as | - | ST500 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2010-08-19 | 2009-08-13 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 27-124mm (4.6x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 3.40 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lb) | 169 gr (0.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | DB-100 | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $211 | $90 |