Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung WB750
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
93 Imaging
36 Features
50 Overall
41
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung WB750 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
- Released September 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung WB750 Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Ricoh CX4 and Samsung WB750, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the CX4 (10MP) and WB750 (13MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe CX4 was launched 12 months prior to the WB750 which means that they are of a similar age. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick overview of how the CX4 matches up against the WB750 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung WB750 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh CX4 & Samsung WB750. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh CX4 Gallery & Samsung WB750 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Samsung WB750
| CX4 | WB750 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the Ricoh CX4
| WB750 | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2011 |  | August 2010 | More modern by 12 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX4 and Samsung WB750
| CX4 | WB750 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung WB750 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and size. The Ricoh CX4 features outer dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung WB750 has specifications of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh CX4 and Samsung WB750 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the CX4 vs the WB750.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the CX4 and WB750 is 92 and 93 respectively.
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung WB750 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes purely by looking at specifications. The picture below may offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the CX4 and WB750.
Plainly, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can count on the Samsung WB750 to give extra detail utilizing its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots more aggressively. The more aged CX4 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung WB750 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung WB750 Specifications
| Ricoh CX4 | Samsung WB750 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh CX4 | Samsung WB750 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2010-08-19 | 2011-09-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 13MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4096 x 3072 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 3.30 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lbs) | 193 gr (0.43 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | DB-100 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $211 | $339 |