Clicky

Ricoh CX4 vs Sony W320

Portability
92
Imaging
33
Features
34
Overall
33
Ricoh CX4 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 front
Portability
97
Imaging
36
Features
21
Overall
30

Ricoh CX4 vs Sony W320 Key Specs

Ricoh CX4
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
  • Announced August 2010
Sony W320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
  • 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
  • Released January 2010
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Ricoh CX4 vs Sony W320 Overview

On this page, we are contrasting the Ricoh CX4 and Sony W320, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Ricoh and Sony. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the CX4 (10MP) and W320 (14MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").

Photography Glossary

The CX4 was introduced 8 months later than the W320 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh CX4 being a Compact camera and the Sony W320 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before we go into a full comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the CX4 grades versus the W320 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Sony W320

 CX4 W320 
ReleasedAugust 2010January 2010Fresher by 8 months
Manual focus More precise focus
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution920k230kSharper display (+690k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Ricoh CX4

 W320 CX4 

Common features in the Ricoh CX4 and Sony W320

 CX4 W320 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly display Absent Touch friendly display

Ricoh CX4 vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison

If you're going to carry your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and measurements. The Ricoh CX4 has exterior measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Sony W320 has proportions of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") along with a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).

Check the Ricoh CX4 and Sony W320 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the CX4 and the W320.

Ricoh CX4 vs Sony W320 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the CX4 and W320 is 92 and 97 respectively.

Ricoh CX4 vs Sony W320 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh CX4 vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it can be tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing only by going over specs. The graphic underneath will give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the CX4 and W320.

All in all, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Sony W320 to offer you more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics more aggressively. The newer CX4 should have a benefit in sensor innovation.

Ricoh CX4 vs Sony W320 sensor size comparison

Ricoh CX4 vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh CX4 vs Sony W320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh CX4 Portrait photography factors
Sony W320 Portrait photography factors
26
focusing manually
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
low resolution (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
28
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not available
no external flash support
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Ricoh CX4 Street photography highlights
Sony W320 Street photography highlights
60
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (205 grams)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
48
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Ricoh CX4 Sports photography info
Sony W320 Sports photography info
24
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
low frames per second (5.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
low resolution (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
26
decent megapixels (14MP)
slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Ricoh CX4 as a Travel photography camera
Sony W320 as a Travel photography camera
66
lighter than average (205 grams)
built-in flash
quite wide (28mm)
long reach (300mm)
low resolution (10MP)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
66
decent megapixels (14MP)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (26mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.7)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh CX4 Landscape photography highlights
Sony W320 Landscape photography highlights
42
focusing manually
quite wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
manual exposure not available
low resolution (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
33
reasonably wide (26mm)
decent megapixels (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.7)
small screen (2.7")
manual exposure not available
does not have image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh CX4 as a Vlogging camera
Sony W320 as a Vlogging camera
30
quite wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (205g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have microphone socket
26
reasonably wide (26mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.7)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have external microphone socket
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh CX4 vs Sony W320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh CX4 and Sony W320
 Ricoh CX4Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
General Information
Brand Name Ricoh Sony
Model Ricoh CX4 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Ultracompact
Announced 2010-08-19 2010-01-07
Physical type Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points - 9
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-300mm (10.7x) 26-105mm (4.0x)
Max aperture f/3.5-5.6 f/2.7-5.7
Macro focus distance 1cm 4cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 920k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 8 secs 1 secs
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/1600 secs
Continuous shutter rate 5.0 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 4.00 m 4.80 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 205 grams (0.45 lbs) 117 grams (0.26 lbs)
Physical dimensions 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model DB-100 NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) Yes (2 sec or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Cost at release $211 $269