Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
- Later Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof and both are manufactured by Ricoh. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the CX5 (10MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe CX5 was manufactured 3 years before the WG-4 GPS which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the CX5 matches up versus the WG-4 GPS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh CX5 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh CX5 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX5 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| CX5 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Ricoh CX5
| WG-4 GPS | CX5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 |  | July 2011 | Newer by 31 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX5 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| CX5 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera often, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh CX5 enjoys outside measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the CX5 vs the WG-4 GPS.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the CX5 and WG-4 GPS is 92 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions only by reading through specs. The image underneath will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the CX5 and WG-4 GPS.
All in all, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to give more detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged CX5 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
| Ricoh CX5 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Ricoh |
| Model | Ricoh CX5 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2011-07-19 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lb) | 235 grams (0.52 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 shots |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | DB-100 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $399 | $210 |