Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB350F
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Announced January 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB350F Overview
In this write-up, we are comparing the Ricoh CX5 and Samsung WB350F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There is a big difference between the resolutions of the CX5 (10MP) and WB350F (16MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe CX5 was revealed 3 years prior to the WB350F and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a in depth comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the CX5 scores vs the WB350F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh CX5 and Samsung WB350F. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh CX5 Gallery and Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX5 over the Samsung WB350F
| CX5 | WB350F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Ricoh CX5
| WB350F | CX5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2014 |  | July 2011 | More recent by 30 months |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh CX5 and Samsung WB350F
| CX5 | WB350F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen |
Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Ricoh CX5 features outer dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB350F has proportions of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh CX5 and Samsung WB350F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the CX5 compared to the WB350F.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the CX5 and WB350F is 92 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to envision the difference between sensor measurements merely by reading through a spec sheet. The visual below should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the CX5 and WB350F.
Clearly, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Samsung WB350F to give you extra detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos far more aggressively. The older CX5 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
| Ricoh CX5 | Samsung WB350F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh CX5 | Samsung WB350F |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2011-07-19 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 16 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205g (0.45 lb) | 276g (0.61 lb) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | DB-100 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $399 | $260 |
