Clicky

Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB350F

Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
35
Overall
34
Ricoh CX5 front
 
Samsung WB350F front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
46
Overall
42

Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs

Ricoh CX5
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
  • Released July 2011
Samsung WB350F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
  • Announced January 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB350F Overview

In this write-up, we are comparing the Ricoh CX5 and Samsung WB350F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There is a big difference between the resolutions of the CX5 (10MP) and WB350F (16MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The CX5 was revealed 3 years prior to the WB350F and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before we go straight into a in depth comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the CX5 scores vs the WB350F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX5 over the Samsung WB350F

 CX5 WB350F 
Display resolution920k460kSharper display (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Ricoh CX5

 WB350F CX5 
AnnouncedJanuary 2014July 2011More recent by 30 months
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Ricoh CX5 and Samsung WB350F

 CX5 WB350F 
Manual focus Dial exact focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display sizing
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen

Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Ricoh CX5 features outer dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB350F has proportions of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).

Check out the Ricoh CX5 and Samsung WB350F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the CX5 compared to the WB350F.

Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB350F size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the CX5 and WB350F is 92 and 90 respectively.

Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB350F top view buttons comparison

Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison

Often, it is very tough to envision the difference between sensor measurements merely by reading through a spec sheet. The visual below should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the CX5 and WB350F.

Clearly, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Samsung WB350F to give you extra detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos far more aggressively. The older CX5 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB350F sensor size comparison

Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Ricoh CX5
Portrait photography with Samsung WB350F
28
manual focus
can't use external flash
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
40
focusing manually
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
cannot use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh CX5
Street photography with Samsung WB350F
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (205g)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
61
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (276g)
screen is fixed
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Ricoh CX5 Sports photography advice
Samsung WB350F Sports photography advice
25
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow continuous shooting (5.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
50
amazing zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Ricoh CX5
Travel photography with Samsung WB350F
66
lighter than competition (205 grams)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
very long reach (300mm)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
69
lighter than competitors in class (276 grams)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
has built in flash
pretty wide (23mm)
great zoom (483mm)
lack of Timelapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh CX5 Landscape photography factors
Samsung WB350F Landscape photography factors
45
manual focus
reasonably wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
50
focusing manually
pretty wide (23mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
lack of Timelapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh CX5 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung WB350F as a Vlogging camera
30
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (205g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have mic jack
34
pretty wide (23mm)
built-in touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competitors in class (276g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of microphone port
Photography Glossary

Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh CX5 and Samsung WB350F
 Ricoh CX5Samsung WB350F
General Information
Company Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh CX5 Samsung WB350F
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2011-07-19 2014-01-07
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-300mm (10.7x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.5-5.6 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focus range 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 920 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8 secs 16 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 5.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 4.00 m -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync -
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080
Max video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 205g (0.45 lb) 276g (0.61 lb)
Dimensions 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model DB-100 SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) -
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Launch price $399 $260