Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung Galaxy NX
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
82 Imaging
62 Features
76 Overall
67
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung Galaxy NX Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Later Model is Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 495g - 137 x 101 x 26mm
- Revealed June 2013
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung Galaxy NX Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung Galaxy NX, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a big difference among the sensor resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and Galaxy NX (20MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and Galaxy NX (APS-C) possess totally different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe GR Digital III was introduced 4 years before the Galaxy NX which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Samsung Galaxy NX being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a quick summary of how the GR Digital III matches up versus the Galaxy NX when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung Galaxy NX Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung Galaxy NX. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery and Samsung Galaxy NX Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Samsung Galaxy NX
GR Digital III | Galaxy NX |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy NX over the Ricoh GR Digital III
Galaxy NX | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2013 | July 2009 | Newer by 47 months | |
Screen dimension | 4.8" | 3" | Bigger screen (+1.8") | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 920k | Crisper screen (+2k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung Galaxy NX
GR Digital III | Galaxy NX | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung Galaxy NX Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR Digital III has got exterior measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) whilst the Samsung Galaxy NX has sizing of 137mm x 101mm x 26mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 1.0") and a weight of 495 grams (1.09 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung Galaxy NX in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using at that moment. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the GR Digital III and the Galaxy NX.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital III and Galaxy NX is 92 and 82 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung Galaxy NX Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to see the difference in sensor dimensions just by looking through technical specs. The picture here should give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the GR Digital III and Galaxy NX.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The GR Digital III using its smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field trickier and the Samsung Galaxy NX will provide you with greater detail using its extra 10MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital III will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung Galaxy NX Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung Galaxy NX Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Samsung Galaxy NX | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital III | Samsung Galaxy NX |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2009-07-27 | 2013-06-20 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | GR engine III | DRIMe IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/1.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 4.8 inches |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | - | HD TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 9.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 208g (0.46 lbs) | 495g (1.09 lbs) |
Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 137 x 101 x 26mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 440 pictures |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $399 | $1,300 |