Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung TL205
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
94 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung TL205 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Announced July 2009
- Refreshed by Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.0-5.6) lens
- 177g - 99 x 59 x 20mm
- Announced January 2010
- Other Name is PL100
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung TL205 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung TL205, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the GR Digital III (10MP) and the TL205 (12MP) is very well matched but the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and TL205 (1/2.3") use different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe GR Digital III was introduced 5 months before the TL205 so they are of a similar age. Both cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL205 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a quick view of how the GR Digital III grades versus the TL205 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung TL205 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR Digital III & Samsung TL205. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery & Samsung TL205 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Samsung TL205
| GR Digital III | TL205 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL205 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
| TL205 | GR Digital III |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung TL205
| GR Digital III | TL205 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2009 |  | January 2010 | Similar age |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung TL205 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR Digital III features exterior dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) while the Samsung TL205 has proportions of 99mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") along with a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung TL205 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select during that time. The following is the front view size comparison of the GR Digital III vs the TL205.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital III and TL205 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung TL205 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizes merely by reading through specs. The image underneath may offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR Digital III and TL205.
All in all, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The GR Digital III using its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Samsung TL205 will give greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos far more aggressively.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung TL205 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung TL205 Specifications
| Ricoh GR Digital III | Samsung TL205 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh GR Digital III | Samsung TL205 |
| Alternative name | - | PL100 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2009-07-27 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | GR engine III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.9 | f/3.0-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 920k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 3.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 208g (0.46 pounds) | 177g (0.39 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 99 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, SD/SDHC Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $399 | $180 |