Clicky

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung TL320

Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
35
Overall
34
Ricoh GR Digital III front
 
Samsung TL320 front
Portability
98
Imaging
35
Features
36
Overall
35

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs

Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
  • Released July 2009
  • Successor is Ricoh GR Digital IV
Samsung TL320
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
  • n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
  • Introduced February 2009
  • Alternate Name is WB1000
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung TL320 Overview

Here is a comprehensive comparison of the Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung TL320, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the GR Digital III (10MP) and the TL320 (12MP) is very well matched but the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and TL320 (1/2.3") feature different sensor measurements.

Photography Glossary

The GR Digital III was launched 6 months later than the TL320 so they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick overview of how the GR Digital III grades versus the TL320 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Samsung TL320

 GR Digital III TL320 
Display resolution920k460kCrisper display (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Ricoh GR Digital III

 TL320 GR Digital III 

Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung TL320

 GR Digital III TL320 
IntroducedJuly 2009February 2009Similar age
Focus manually More exact focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display measurements
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch friendly display Absent Touch friendly display

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to carry your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR Digital III enjoys physical dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL320 has sizing of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

See the Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung TL320 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose at that time. The following is the front view size comparison of the GR Digital III and the TL320.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung TL320 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the GR Digital III and TL320 is 92 and 98 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung TL320 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it can be tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizing merely by reading through specs. The visual below may give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the GR Digital III and TL320.

As you can plainly see, both the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The GR Digital III featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Samsung TL320 will resolve greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics somewhat more aggressively.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung TL320 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung TL320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Portrait photography highlights
Samsung TL320 Portrait photography highlights
40
has manual focus
exports RAW formats
MP count low (10MP)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
34
has manual focus
supports face detect autofocus
external flash not possible
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III as a Street photography camera
Samsung TL320 as a Street photography camera
55
exports RAW formats
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor (1/1.7")
58
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III as a Sports photography camera
Samsung TL320 as a Sports photography camera
17
focal length is fixed (28mm)
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
30
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
low megapixels (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III as a Travel photography camera
Samsung TL320 as a Travel photography camera
63
built-in flash
great maximum aperture (f1.9)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
59
built-in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Landscape photography details
Samsung TL320 Landscape photography details
45
has manual focus
great maximum aperture (f1.9)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
exports RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
43
has manual focus
pretty wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
does not have Time Lapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Vlogging details
Samsung TL320 Vlogging details
25
great maximum aperture (f1.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of external microphone support
31
pretty wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect autofocus
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have mic support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung TL320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung TL320
 Ricoh GR Digital IIISamsung TL320
General Information
Brand Name Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh GR Digital III Samsung TL320
Also called as - WB1000
Type Small Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Released 2009-07-27 2009-02-23
Physical type Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip GR engine III -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 64 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28mm (1x) 24-120mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture f/1.9 f/2.8-5.8
Macro focus distance 1cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 4.8 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 3"
Screen resolution 920k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (optional) None
Features
Min shutter speed 1 seconds 16 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.00 m 5.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 208g (0.46 lbs) -
Dimensions 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal
Card slots Single Single
Launch cost $399 $380