Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB350F
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Announced July 2009
- Refreshed by Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Launched January 2014
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB350F Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Samsung WB350F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and WB350F (16MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and WB350F (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe GR Digital III was introduced 5 years before the WB350F and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a in depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the GR Digital III matches up versus the WB350F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GR Digital III & Samsung WB350F. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery & Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Samsung WB350F
GR Digital III | WB350F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Ricoh GR Digital III
WB350F | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2014 | July 2009 | More recent by 54 months | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung WB350F
GR Digital III | WB350F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen size | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR Digital III provides physical dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) while the Samsung WB350F has measurements of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Samsung WB350F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the GR Digital III compared to the WB350F.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital III and WB350F is 92 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements only by viewing technical specs. The photograph underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the GR Digital III and WB350F.
As you have seen, both cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The GR Digital III with its bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh simpler and the Samsung WB350F will provide you with extra detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older GR Digital III will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Samsung WB350F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital III | Samsung WB350F |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2009-07-27 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | GR engine III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1 secs | 16 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 208 grams (0.46 lbs) | 276 grams (0.61 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $399 | $260 |