Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A99 II
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
57 Imaging
77 Features
92 Overall
83
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A99 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Released July 2009
- Successor is Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 42MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Raise to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 849g - 143 x 104 x 76mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Previous Model is Sony A99
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A99 II Overview
The following is a in-depth review of the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony A99 II, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced DSLR by companies Ricoh and Sony. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and A99 II (42MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and A99 II (Full frame) offer totally different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe GR Digital III was unveiled 8 years earlier than the A99 II which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Sony A99 II being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the GR Digital III grades vs the A99 II in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A99 II Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR Digital III & Sony Alpha A99 II. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery & Sony A99 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Sony A99 II
GR Digital III | A99 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A99 II over the Ricoh GR Digital III
A99 II | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2016 | July 2009 | Newer by 87 months | |
Display type | Fully articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1229k | 920k | Sharper display (+309k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony A99 II
GR Digital III | A99 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display size | |
Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A99 II Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR Digital III provides outside measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) whilst the Sony A99 II has measurements of 143mm x 104mm x 76mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.0") and a weight of 849 grams (1.87 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony A99 II in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the GR Digital III against the A99 II.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital III and A99 II is 92 and 57 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A99 II Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to envision the gap in sensor dimensions simply by looking through specifications. The pic underneath may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the GR Digital III and A99 II.
Plainly, both the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The GR Digital III having a smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field tougher and the Sony A99 II will provide you with extra detail having an extra 32MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital III will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A99 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A99 II Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Sony Alpha A99 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital III | Sony Alpha A99 II |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Released | 2009-07-27 | 2016-09-19 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | GR engine III | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 42MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 7952 x 5304 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 102400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 399 |
Cross type focus points | - | 79 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/1.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, redeye reduction, rear sync, high-speed sync, wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 208 gr (0.46 lb) | 849 gr (1.87 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 143 x 104 x 76mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 92 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 25.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 2317 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 490 photographs |
Battery format | - | NP-FM500H lithium-ion battery & charger |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC/MS Duo slots |
Storage slots | 1 | Two |
Launch price | $399 | $3,198 |