Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung CL5
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
95 Imaging
32 Features
14 Overall
24
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung CL5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Launched November 2009
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-4.5) lens
- 141g - 93 x 60 x 19mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Alternate Name is PL10
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung CL5 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung CL5, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Ultracompact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and CL5 (9MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) and CL5 (1/2.5") have totally different sensor sizes.
Photography GlossaryThe GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro was brought out 9 months after the CL5 and they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung CL5 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight to a full comparison, here is a quick overview of how the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro grades against the CL5 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung CL5 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung CL5. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery and Samsung CL5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Samsung CL5
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | CL5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | November 2009 | February 2009 | Newer by 9 months | |
Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL5 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
CL5 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung CL5
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | CL5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung CL5 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro enjoys external dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") having a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs) whilst the Samsung CL5 has dimensions of 93mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") along with a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs).
See the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung CL5 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select at that moment. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro compared to the CL5.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and CL5 is 77 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung CL5 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions just by reviewing specifications. The image underneath should give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and CL5.
Plainly, each of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro because of its larger sensor will make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro will offer greater detail having its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images way more aggressively. The fresher GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung CL5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung CL5 Specifications
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Samsung CL5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Samsung CL5 |
Also referred to as | - | PL10 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2009-11-10 | 2009-02-23 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | GR engine III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.5" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor area | 370.5mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 3456 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 50mm (1x) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.5 | f/3.5-4.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 180s | 16s |
Max shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 453g (1.00 pounds) | 141g (0.31 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") | 93 x 60 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $566 | $391 |