Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A200
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34


66 Imaging
49 Features
38 Overall
44
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Successor is Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Launched July 2008
- Later Model is Sony A230

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A200 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A200, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Ricoh and Sony. The resolution of the GR Digital III (10MP) and the A200 (10MP) is pretty close but the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and A200 (APS-C) have different sensor sizing.

The GR Digital III was brought out 13 months later than the A200 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a short view of how the GR Digital III grades vs the A200 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A200 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GR Digital III & Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery & Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Sony A200
GR Digital III | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2009 | ![]() | July 2008 | More recent by 13 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
A200 | GR Digital III |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony A200
GR Digital III | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera often, you should factor in its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR Digital III provides outside dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) whilst the Sony A200 has measurements of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A200 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the GR Digital III and the A200.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital III and A200 is 92 and 66 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to picture the contrast in sensor measurements just by viewing a spec sheet. The graphic underneath may give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR Digital III and A200.
As you can see, both cameras feature the identical resolution albeit different sensor measurements. The GR Digital III has the smaller sensor which will make achieving shallow DOF harder. The newer GR Digital III should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A200 Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital III | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Revealed | 2009-07-27 | 2008-07-17 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | GR engine III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3872 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/1.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 208g (0.46 lb) | 572g (1.26 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 63 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.3 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 521 |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | Compact Flash |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $399 | $100 |