Clicky

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A200

Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
35
Overall
34
Ricoh GR Digital III front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 front
Portability
66
Imaging
49
Features
38
Overall
44

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A200 Key Specs

Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
  • Revealed July 2009
  • Successor is Ricoh GR Digital IV
Sony A200
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
  • Launched July 2008
  • Later Model is Sony A230
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A200 Overview

Let's look more closely at the Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A200, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Ricoh and Sony. The resolution of the GR Digital III (10MP) and the A200 (10MP) is pretty close but the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and A200 (APS-C) have different sensor sizing.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The GR Digital III was brought out 13 months later than the A200 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a short view of how the GR Digital III grades vs the A200 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Sony A200

 GR Digital III A200 
LaunchedJuly 2009July 2008More recent by 13 months
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k230kCrisper screen (+690k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Ricoh GR Digital III

 A200 GR Digital III 

Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony A200

 GR Digital III A200 
Focus manually Dial accurate focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Missing Touch friendly screen

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to lug around your camera often, you should factor in its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR Digital III provides outside dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) whilst the Sony A200 has measurements of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).

Compare the Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A200 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the GR Digital III and the A200.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A200 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital III and A200 is 92 and 66 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A200 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be difficult to picture the contrast in sensor measurements just by viewing a spec sheet. The graphic underneath may give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR Digital III and A200.

As you can see, both cameras feature the identical resolution albeit different sensor measurements. The GR Digital III has the smaller sensor which will make achieving shallow DOF harder. The newer GR Digital III should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A200 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Portrait photography advice
Sony A200 Portrait photography advice
40
has manual focus
exports RAW files
low resolution sensor (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/1.7")
53
has manual focus
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
no liveview
sensor resolution low (10MP)
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III as a Street photography camera
Sony A200 as a Street photography camera
55
exports RAW files
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/1.7")
65
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
no articulating screen
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Sports photography highlights
Sony A200 Sports photography highlights
17
fixed focal length (28mm)
does not have image stabilization
low resolution sensor (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/1.7")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
49
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports phase detect autofocus
no liveview
max frames per second low (3.0 frames per second)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III as a Travel photography camera
Sony A200 as a Travel photography camera
63
flash built-in
fast max aperture (f1.9)
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
46
built-in flash
doesn't have Timelapse recording
sensor resolution low (10MP)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Ricoh GR Digital III
Landscape photography with Sony A200
45
has manual focus
fast max aperture (f1.9)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
exports RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
does not have image stabilization
low resolution sensor (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/1.7")
53
has manual focus
change lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
no liveview
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III as a Vlogging camera
Sony A200 as a Vlogging camera
25
fast max aperture (f1.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of external microphone socket
9
can't shoot video
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony A200
 Ricoh GR Digital IIISony Alpha DSLR-A200
General Information
Manufacturer Ricoh Sony
Model type Ricoh GR Digital III Sony Alpha DSLR-A200
Category Small Sensor Compact Entry-Level DSLR
Revealed 2009-07-27 2008-07-17
Body design Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Chip GR engine III -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" APS-C
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 -
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 3872 x 2592
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 64 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens zoom range 28mm (1x) -
Largest aperture f/1.9 -
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Total lenses - 143
Crop factor 4.8 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of screen 920 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (optional) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.55x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 1 seconds 30 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed - 3.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) -
Max video resolution 640x480 None
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 208g (0.46 lb) 572g (1.26 lb)
Physical dimensions 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 63
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.3
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 11.3
DXO Low light rating not tested 521
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC, Internal Compact Flash
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $399 $100